# Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methods

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07263 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07263/

## Key facts

- Cited by 546 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 May 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 546)

- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00614/) (2023)
- [Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06387/) (2023)
- [Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13213/) (2023)
- [Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.02705/) (2023)
- [Improving Robustness using Generated Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09468/) (2021)
- [Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01167/) (2021)
- [Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04222/) (2023)
- [Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01946/) (2021)
- [Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05328/) (2021)
- [Certifiably Robust RAG against Retrieval Corruption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15556/) (2024)
- [DataSentinel: A Game-Theoretic Detection of Prompt Injection Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11358/) (2025)
- [The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against Llm Jailbreaks and Prompt Injections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09023/) (2025)
- [Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00401/) (2021)
- [Adaptive Attacks Break Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00061/) (2025)
- [An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18025/) (2024)
- [Globally-Robust Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08452/) (2021)
- [Shifts: A Dataset of Real Distributional Shift Across Multiple Large-Scale Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07455/) (2021)
- [Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06641/) (2021)
- [Types of Out-of-Distribution Texts and How to Detect Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06827/) (2021)
- [Graph Posterior Network: Bayesian Predictive Uncertainty for Node Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14012/) (2021)
- [Parallel Rectangle Flip Attack: A Query-based Black-box Attack against Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08970/) (2022)
- [Adversarial Laser Beam: Effective Physical-World Attack to DNNs in a Blink](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06504/) (2021)
- [Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13587/) (2024)
- [Evaluating the Susceptibility of Pre-Trained Language Models via Handcrafted Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.02128/) (2022)
- [MT3: Meta Test-Time Training for Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16201/) (2021)
- [PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.09135/) (2021)
- [Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Adaptive Test-time Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13711/) (2022)
- [Robot Learning from Randomized Simulations: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00956/) (2021)
- [A Dynamical System Perspective for Lipschitz Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12690/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples: inputs that are close to natural inputs but classified incorrectly. In order to better understand the space of adversarial examples, we survey ten recent proposals that are designed for detection and compare their efficacy. We show that all can be defeated by constructing new loss functions. We conclude that adversarial examples are significantly harder to detect than previously appreciated, and the properties believed to be intrinsic to adversarial examples are in fact not. Finally, we propose several simple guidelines for evaluating future proposed defenses.
