# Consistent On-Line Off-Policy Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.07121 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.07121/

## Key facts

- Cited by 51 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 51)

- [Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01643/) (2020)
- [Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04779/) (2020)
- [MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.05951/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01387/) (2022)
- [Bootstrapping Fitted Q-Evaluation for Off-Policy Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.03607/) (2021)
- [Nearly Horizon-Free Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14077/) (2021)
- [Average-Reward Off-Policy Policy Evaluation with Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02808/) (2021)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Soft Behavior Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07395/) (2021)
- [A Generalized Projected Bellman Error for Off-policy Value Estimation in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.13844/) (2021)
- [Train Once, Get a Family: State-Adaptive Balances for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17966/) (2023)
- [Flexible Option Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03097/) (2021)
- [Sparse Feature Selection Makes Batch Reinforcement Learning More Sample Efficient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.04019/) (2020)
- [An Instrumental Variable Approach to Confounded Off-Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.14468/) (2022)
- [A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Marginalized Importance Sampling with the Successor Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06854/) (2021)
- [Reinforcement Learning in Low-Rank MDPs with Density Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02252/) (2023)
- [Global Optimality and Finite Sample Analysis of Softmax Off-Policy Actor Critic under State Distribution Mismatch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02997/) (2021)
- [Grounding Aleatoric Uncertainty for Unsupervised Environment Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05219/) (2022)
- [Continual Learning In Environments With Polynomial Mixing Times](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07066/) (2021)
- [Hallucinated Adversarial Control for Conservative Offline Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01076/) (2023)
- [A CMDP-within-online framework for Meta-Safe Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16601/) (2024)
- [Truncated Emphatic Temporal Difference Methods for Prediction and Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05338/) (2021)
- [Target Networks and Over-parameterization Stabilize Off-policy Bootstrapping with Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21043/) (2024)
- [Continual Auxiliary Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11133/) (2022)
- [Correcting discount-factor mismatch in on-policy policy gradient methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13284/) (2023)
- [Scaling Marginalized Importance Sampling to High-Dimensional State-Spaces via State Abstraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07486/) (2022)
- [Revisiting a Design Choice in Gradient Temporal Difference Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01170/) (2023)
- [On the Global Optimality of Policy Gradient Methods in General Utility Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04108/) (2024)
- [Solving Continual Offline RL through Selective Weights Activation on Aligned Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15698/) (2024)
- [Learning Expected Emphatic Traces for Deep RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05405/) (2021)
- [SOPE: Spectrum of Off-Policy Estimators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.03936/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The problem of on-line off-policy evaluation (OPE) has been actively studied in the last decade due to its importance both as a stand-alone problem and as a module in a policy improvement scheme. However, most Temporal Difference (TD) based solutions ignore the discrepancy between the stationary distribution of the behavior and target policies and its effect on the convergence limit when function approximation is applied. In this paper we propose the Consistent Off-Policy Temporal Difference (COP-TD(λ, β)) algorithm that addresses this issue and reduces this bias at some computational expense. We show that COP-TD(λ, β) can be designed to converge to the same value that would have been obtained by using on-policy TD(λ) with the target policy. Subsequently, the proposed scheme leads to a related and promising heuristic we call log-COP-TD(λ, β). Both algorithms have favorable empirical results to the current state of the art on-line OPE algorithms. Finally, our formulation sheds some new light on the recently proposed Emphatic TD learning.
