# Delving Deeper into MOOC Student Dropout Prediction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.06404 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.06404/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Meta Transfer Learning for Early Success Prediction in MOOCs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01064/) (2022)
- [Augmenting deep neural networks with symbolic knowledge: Towards trustworthy and interpretable AI for education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00393/) (2023)
- [Deep Learning for Educational Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19675/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Distillation in RNN-Attention Models for Early Prediction of Student Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14526/) (2024)
- [Students Success Modeling: Most Important Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13052/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In order to obtain reliable accuracy estimates for automatic MOOC dropout predictors, it is important to train and test them in a manner consistent with how they will be used in practice. Yet most prior research on MOOC dropout prediction has measured test accuracy on the same course used for training the classifier, which can lead to overly optimistic accuracy estimates. In order to understand better how accuracy is affected by the training+testing regime, we compared the accuracy of a standard dropout prediction architecture (clickstream features + logistic regression) across 4 different training paradigms. Results suggest that (1) training and testing on the same course ("post-hoc") can overestimate accuracy by several percentage points; (2) dropout classifiers trained on proxy labels based on students' persistence are surprisingly competitive with post-hoc training (87.33% versus 90.20% AUC averaged over 8 weeks of 40 HarvardX MOOCs); and (3) classifier performance does not vary significantly with the academic discipline. Finally, we also research new dropout prediction architectures based on deep, fully-connected, feed-forward neural networks and find that (4) networks with as many as 5 hidden layers can statistically significantly increase test accuracy over that of logistic regression.