# Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer from 18F-FDG PET/CT images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02223 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.02223/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Towards Generalizable Tumor Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19470/) (2024)
- [Analyzing Tumors by Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06035/) (2024)
- [sMRI-PatchNet: A novel explainable patch-based deep learning network for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and discriminative atrophy localisation with Structural MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08967/) (2023)
- [AI-Based Detection, Classification and Prediction/Prognosis in Medical Imaging: Towards Radiophenomics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10332/) (2021)
- [The Power of Combining Data and Knowledge: GPT-4o is an Effective Interpreter of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis of Lung Cancer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.17900/) (2024)
- [Review and Recommendations for using Artificial Intelligence in Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18614/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The present study shows that the performance of CNN is not significantly different from the best classical methods and human doctors for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of NSCLC from PET/CT images. Because CNN does not need tumor segmentation or feature calculation, it is more convenient and more objective than the classical methods. However, CNN does not make use of the import diagnostic features, which have been proved more discriminative than the texture features for classifying small-sized lymph nodes. Therefore, incorporating the diagnostic features into CNN is a promising direction for future research.
