# Likelihood-free inference by ratio estimation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.10242 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.10242/

## Key facts

- Cited by 81 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2016.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 81)

- [Benchmarking Simulation-Based Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04653/) (2021)
- [Modern Bayesian Experimental Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14545/) (2023)
- [Flow Matching for Scalable Simulation-Based Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17161/) (2023)
- [Implicit Deep Adaptive Design: Policy-Based Experimental Design without Likelihoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02329/) (2021)
- [Sequential Neural Score Estimation: Likelihood-Free Inference with Conditional Score Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04872/) (2022)
- [Learning Robust Statistics for Simulation-based Inference under Model Misspecification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15871/) (2023)
- [Robust Neural Posterior Estimation and Statistical Model Criticism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06564/) (2022)
- [Sampling-Based Accuracy Testing of Posterior Estimators for General Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03026/) (2023)
- [Investigating the Impact of Model Misspecification in Neural Simulation-based Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.01845/) (2022)
- [Variational methods for simulation-based inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04176/) (2022)
- [Truncated proposals for scalable and hassle-free simulation-based inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04815/) (2022)
- [Neural Methods for Amortized Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12484/) (2024)
- [GATSBI: Generative Adversarial Training for Simulation-Based Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06481/) (2022)
- [Featurized Density Ratio Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02212/) (2021)
- [Simulation-Based Inference: A Practical Guide](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12939/) (2025)
- [Sequential Neural Posterior and Likelihood Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06522/) (2021)
- [Truncated Marginal Neural Ratio Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.01214/) (2021)
- [A Trust Crisis In Simulation-Based Inference? Your Posterior Approximations Can Be Unfaithful](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06581/) (2021)
- [Towards Reliable Simulation-Based Inference with Balanced Neural Ratio Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.13624/) (2022)
- [Gradient-based Bayesian Experimental Design for Implicit Models using Mutual Information Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04379/) (2021)
- [BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09009/) (2021)
- [Bayesian Sequential Optimal Experimental Design for Nonlinear Models Using Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.15335/) (2021)
- [TSGM: A Flexible Framework for Generative Modeling of Synthetic Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11567/) (2023)
- [Generalized Bayesian Inference for Scientific Simulators via Amortized Cost Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15208/) (2023)
- [Black-box Bayesian inference for economic agent-based models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00625/) (2022)
- [Neural Bayes Estimators for Irregular Spatial Data using Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02600/) (2023)
- [Step-DAD: Semi-Amortized Policy-Based Bayesian Experimental Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14057/) (2025)
- [Likelihood-Free Frequentist Inference: Bridging Classical Statistics and Machine Learning for Reliable Simulator-Based Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03920/) (2021)
- [Unifying Likelihood-free Inference with Black-box Optimization and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03372/) (2021)
- [Bayesian model calibration for block copolymer self-assembly: Likelihood-free inference and expected information gain computation via measure transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11343/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of parametric statistical inference when likelihood computations are prohibitively expensive but sampling from the model is possible. Several so-called likelihood-free methods have been developed to perform inference in the absence of a likelihood function. The popular synthetic likelihood approach infers the parameters by modelling summary statistics of the data by a Gaussian probability distribution. In another popular approach called approximate Bayesian computation, the inference is performed by identifying parameter values for which the summary statistics of the simulated data are close to those of the observed data. Synthetic likelihood is easier to use as no measure of `closeness' is required but the Gaussianity assumption is often limiting. Moreover, both approaches require judiciously chosen summary statistics. We here present an alternative inference approach that is as easy to use as synthetic likelihood but not as restricted in its assumptions, and that, in a natural way, enables automatic selection of relevant summary statistic from a large set of candidates. The basic idea is to frame the problem of estimating the posterior as a problem of estimating the ratio between the data generating distribution and the marginal distribution. This problem can be solved by logistic regression, and including regularising penalty terms enables automatic selection of the summary statistics relevant to the inference task. We illustrate the general theory on canonical examples and employ it to perform inference for challenging stochastic nonlinear dynamical systems and high-dimensional summary statistics.
