# Tight lower bounds for the complexity of multicoloring

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03432 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.03432/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2016.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [On Computing Optimal Tree Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04423/) (2023)
- [Disentangling the Computational Complexity of Network Untangling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02668/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the multicoloring problem, also known as (a:b)-coloring or b-fold coloring, we are given a graph G and a set of a colors, and the task is to assign a subset of b colors to each vertex of G so that adjacent vertices receive disjoint color subsets. This natural generalization of the classic coloring problem (the b=1 case) is equivalent to finding a homomorphism to the Kneser graph KGa,b, and gives relaxations approaching the fractional chromatic number. We study the complexity of determining whether a graph has an (a:b)-coloring. Our main result is that this problem does not admit an algorithm with running time f(b)· 2o(log b)· n, for any computable f(b), unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. A (b+1)n· poly(n)-time algorithm due to Nederlof [2008] shows that this is tight. A direct corollary of our result is that the graph homomorphism problem does not admit a 2O(n+h) algorithm unless ETH fails, even if the target graph is required to be a Kneser graph. This refines the understanding given by the recent lower bound of Cygan et al. [SODA 2016]. The crucial ingredient in our hardness reduction is the usage of detecting matrices of Lindstr"om [Canad. Math. Bull., 1965], which is a combinatorial tool that, to the best of our knowledge, has not yet been used for proving complexity lower bounds. As a side result, we prove that the running time of the algorithms of Abasi et al. [MFCS 2014] and of Gabizon et al. [ESA 2015] for the r-monomial detection problem are optimal under ETH.