# Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.02452 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.02452/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2016.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05617/) (2022)
- [MRI Images, Brain Lesions and Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05091/) (2021)
- [Artificial Intelligence in Concrete Materials: A Scientometric View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09636/) (2022)
- [Does Scientific Writing Converge to U.S. English? Evidence from Generative AI-Assisted Publications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.11687/) (2025)
- [Network Visualization of ChatGPT Research: a study based on term and keyword co-occurrence network analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01948/) (2023)
- [Artificial Intelligence in the Service of Entrepreneurial Finance: Knowledge Structure and the Foundational Algorithmic Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13213/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The analysis of bibliometric networks, such as co-authorship, bibliographic coupling, and co-citation networks, has received a considerable amount of attention. Much less attention has been paid to the construction of these networks. We point out that different approaches can be taken to construct a bibliometric network. Normally the full counting approach is used, but we propose an alternative fractional counting approach. The basic idea of the fractional counting approach is that each action, such as co-authoring or citing a publication, should have equal weight, regardless of for instance the number of authors, citations, or references of a publication. We present two empirical analyses in which the full and fractional counting approaches yield very different results. These analyses deal with co-authorship networks of universities and bibliographic coupling networks of journals. Based on theoretical considerations and on the empirical analyses, we conclude that for many purposes the fractional counting approach is preferable over the full counting one.