# Query-Focused Opinion Summarization for User-Generated Content

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05702 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05702/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2016.

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Consistency is Key: Disentangling Label Variation in Natural Language Processing with Intra-Annotator Agreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10684/) (2023)
- [Towards Personalized Answer Generation in E-Commerce via Multi-Perspective Preference Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.13556/) (2021)
- [Decision-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06896/) (2021)
- [AnswerSumm: A Manually-Curated Dataset and Pipeline for Answer Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06474/) (2021)
- [Beyond Opinion Mining: Summarizing Opinions of Customer Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01543/) (2022)
- [Multi-Perspective Abstractive Answer Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08536/) (2021)
- [How to Train Text Summarization Model with Weak Supervisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00098/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a submodular function-based framework for query-focused opinion summarization. Within our framework, relevance ordering produced by a statistical ranker, and information coverage with respect to topic distribution and diverse viewpoints are both encoded as submodular functions. Dispersion functions are utilized to minimize the redundancy. We are the first to evaluate different metrics of text similarity for submodularity-based summarization methods. By experimenting on community QA and blog summarization, we show that our system outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both automatic evaluation and human evaluation. A human evaluation task is conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk with scale, and shows that our systems are able to generate summaries of high overall quality and information diversity.
