# Unbiased split variable selection for random survival forests using maximally selected rank statistics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.03391 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.03391/

## Key facts

- Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2016.

## Built on by (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [SurvNAM: The machine learning survival model explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08903/) (2021)
- [OmiEmbed: a unified multi-task deep learning framework for multi-omics data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02669/) (2021)
- [An Imprecise SHAP as a Tool for Explaining the Class Probability Distributions under Limited Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09111/) (2021)
- [SurvBeX: An explanation method of the machine learning survival models based on the Beran estimator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03730/) (2023)
- [AMMASurv: Asymmetrical Multi-Modal Attention for Accurate Survival Analysis with Whole Slide Images and Gene Expression Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12565/) (2021)
- [Prediction of Dilatory Behavior in eLearning: A Comparison of Multiple Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.15079/) (2022)
- [Ensemble feature selection with data-driven thresholding for Alzheimer's disease biomarker discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01822/) (2022)
- [Actionable Recourse via GANs for Mobile Health](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06525/) (2022)
- [BENK: The Beran Estimator with Neural Kernels for Estimating the Heterogeneous Treatment Effect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10793/) (2022)
- [Opening the random forest black box by the analysis of the mutual impact of features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02490/) (2023)
- [The Digital Transformation in Health: How AI Can Improve the Performance of Health Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16098/) (2024)
- [SurvBETA: Ensemble-Based Survival Models Using Beran Estimators and Several Attention Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07638/) (2024)
- [Ensemble feature selection with clustering for analysis of high-dimensional, correlated clinical data in the search for Alzheimer's disease biomarkers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02380/) (2022)
- [Adaptive Interventions for Global Health: A Case Study of Malaria](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02075/) (2023)
- [A personalized Uncertainty Quantification framework for patient survival models: estimating individual uncertainty of patients with metastatic brain tumors in the absence of ground truth](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17173/) (2023)
- [SurvBeNIM: The Beran-Based Neural Importance Model for Explaining the Survival Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06638/) (2023)
- [Cycling into the workshop: predictive maintenance for Barcelona's bike-sharing system](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17217/) (2024)
- [Optimizing HIV Patient Engagement with Reinforcement Learning in Resource-Limited Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07629/) (2024)
- [Adaptive User Journeys in Pharma E-Commerce with Reinforcement Learning: Insights from SwipeRx](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08024/) (2024)
- [Survival Concept-Based Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05950/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistent Equation-guided Neural Networks for Censored Time-to-Event Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09097/) (2025)
- [Ensemble-Based Survival Models with the Self-Attended Beran Estimator Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07933/) (2025)
- [Optimizing Prognostic Biomarker Discovery in Pancreatic Cancer Through Hybrid Ensemble Feature Selection and Multi-Omics Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02648/) (2025)
- [SDPM: Survival Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Continuous-Time Survival Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22776/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The most popular approach for analyzing survival data is the Cox regression model. The Cox model may, however, be misspecified, and its proportionality assumption may not always be fulfilled. An alternative approach for survival prediction is random forests for survival outcomes. The standard split criterion for random survival forests is the log-rank test statistics, which favors splitting variables with many possible split points. Conditional inference forests avoid this split variable selection bias. However, linear rank statistics are utilized by default in conditional inference forests to select the optimal splitting variable, which cannot detect non-linear effects in the independent variables. An alternative is to use maximally selected rank statistics for the split point selection. As in conditional inference forests, splitting variables are compared on the p-value scale. However, instead of the conditional Monte-Carlo approach used in conditional inference forests, p-value approximations are employed. We describe several p-value approximations and the implementation of the proposed random forest approach. A simulation study demonstrates that unbiased split variable selection is possible. However, there is a trade-off between unbiased split variable selection and runtime. In benchmark studies of prediction performance on simulated and real datasets the new method performs better than random survival forests if informative dichotomous variables are combined with uninformative variables with more categories and better than conditional inference forests if non-linear covariate effects are included. In a runtime comparison the method proves to be computationally faster than both alternatives, if a simple p-value approximation is used.