# Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.08462 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.08462/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2016.

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Establishing Construct Validity in LLM Capability Benchmarks Requires Nomological Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15121/) (2026)
- [Module-based regularization improves Gaussian graphical models when observing noisy data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16796/) (2023)
- [New methods for new data? An overview and illustration of quantitative inductive methods for HRM research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08889/) (2023)
- [Valid Bootstraps for Network Embeddings with Applications to Network Visualisation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20895/) (2024)
- [Delving Into the Psychology of Machines: Exploring the Structure of Self-Regulated Learning via LLM-Generated Survey Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13384/) (2025)
- [Human-AI collaboration or obedient and often clueless AI in instruct, serve, repeat dynamics?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10919/) (2025)
- [Psychological Imagination Networks Show Cross-Population Centrality and Clustering Alignment in Humans That Large Language Models Fail to Replicate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04391/) (2025)
- [Emotionally Vulnerable Subtype of Internet Gaming Disorder: Measuring and Exploring the Pathology of Problematic Generative AI Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06908/) (2025)
- [Heterogeneous Ordinal Structure Learning with Bayesian Nonparametric Complexity Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04191/) (2026)
- [Trajectory-Aware Node Contributions and the Limits of Static Controllability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03067/) (2026)
- [Transfer Learning in High-dimensional Ising Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03005/) (2026)
- [High-dimensional networks and mean squared error for possibly misspecified models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13171/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The usage of psychological networks that conceptualize psychological behavior as a complex interplay of psychological and other components has gained increasing popularity in various fields of psychology. While prior publications have tackled the topics of estimating and interpreting such networks, little work has been conducted to check how accurate (i.e., prone to sampling variation) networks are estimated, and how stable (i.e., interpretation remains similar with less observations) inferences from the network structure (such as centrality indices) are. In this tutorial paper, we aim to introduce the reader to this field and tackle the problem of accuracy under sampling variation. We first introduce the current state-of-the-art of network estimation. Second, we provide a rationale why researchers should investigate the accuracy of psychological networks. Third, we describe how bootstrap routines can be used to (A) assess the accuracy of estimated network connections, (B) investigate the stability of centrality indices, and (C) test whether network connections and centrality estimates for different variables differ from each other. We introduce two novel statistical methods: for (B) the correlation stability coefficient, and for (C) the bootstrapped difference test for edge-weights and centrality indices. We conducted and present simulation studies to assess the performance of both methods. Finally, we developed the free R-package bootnet that allows for estimating psychological networks in a generalized framework in addition to the proposed bootstrap methods. We showcase bootnet in a tutorial, accompanied by R syntax, in which we analyze a dataset of 359 women with posttraumatic stress disorder available online.