# Automated Correction for Syntax Errors in Programming Assignments using Recurrent Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.06129 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.06129/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2016.

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Deep Learning for Code Intelligence: Survey, Benchmark and Toolkit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00288/) (2023)
- [Poison Attack and Defense on Deep Source Code Processing Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17029/) (2022)
- [Variable Name Recovery in Decompiled Binary Code using Constrained Masked Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12801/) (2021)
- [Giving Feedback on Interactive Student Programs with Meta-Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08802/) (2022)
- [Learning to Make Compiler Optimizations More Effective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13514/) (2021)
- [Play to Grade: Testing Coding Games as Classifying Markov Decision Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14615/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Artificial Intelligence for Source Code: A Dialogue Systems Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04847/) (2022)
- [Neural Machine Translation for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13504/) (2023)
- [AuPair: Golden Example Pairs for Code Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18487/) (2025)
- [Program Repair with Minimal Edits Using CodeT5](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14760/) (2023)
- [Assessing the Effectiveness of Syntactic Structure to Learn Code Edit Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06110/) (2021)
- [Embedding Code Contexts for Cryptographic API Suggestion:New Methodologies and Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08747/) (2021)
- [Anomaly Detection with Neural Parsers That Never Reject](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00103/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a method for automatically generating repair feedback for syntax errors for introductory programming problems. Syntax errors constitute one of the largest classes of errors (34%) in our dataset of student submissions obtained from a MOOC course on edX. The previous techniques for generating automated feed- back on programming assignments have focused on functional correctness and style considerations of student programs. These techniques analyze the program AST of the program and then perform some dynamic and symbolic analyses to compute repair feedback. Unfortunately, it is not possible to generate ASTs for student pro- grams with syntax errors and therefore the previous feedback techniques are not applicable in repairing syntax errors. We present a technique for providing feedback on syntax errors that uses Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to model syntactically valid token sequences. Our approach is inspired from the recent work on learning language models from Big Code (large code corpus). For a given programming assignment, we first learn an RNN to model all valid token sequences using the set of syntactically correct student submissions. Then, for a student submission with syntax errors, we query the learnt RNN model with the prefix to- ken sequence to predict token sequences that can fix the error by either replacing or inserting the predicted token sequence at the error location. We evaluate our technique on over 14, 000 student submissions with syntax errors. Our technique can completely re- pair 31.69% (4501/14203) of submissions with syntax errors and in addition partially correct 6.39% (908/14203) of the submissions.