# Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.01644 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.01644/

## Key facts

- Cited by 140 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2015.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 140)

- [Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13624/) (2021)
- [Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11251/) (2021)
- [The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01602/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13076/) (2021)
- [OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11104/) (2022)
- [Unbox the Black-box for the Medical Explainable AI via Multi-modal and Multi-centre Data Fusion: A Mini-Review, Two Showcases and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01998/) (2021)
- [Goal Driven Discovery of Distributional Differences via Language Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14233/) (2023)
- [On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.03640/) (2021)
- [Describing Differences between Text Distributions with Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12323/) (2022)
- [Entropy-based Logic Explanations of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06804/) (2021)
- [Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.10618/) (2021)
- [Local Explanations via Necessity and Sufficiency: Unifying Theory and Practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14651/) (2021)
- [Logic Explained Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05149/) (2021)
- [Scalable Rule-Based Representation Learning for Interpretable Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.15103/) (2021)
- [Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07277/) (2022)
- [Towards Relatable Explainable AI with the Perceptual Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14005/) (2021)
- [Learning Accurate and Interpretable Decision Rule Sets from Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02826/) (2021)
- [A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare: Why, How, and When?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04780/) (2023)
- [Hierarchical Shrinkage: improving the accuracy and interpretability of tree-based methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00858/) (2022)
- [Dissonance Between Human and Machine Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.07337/) (2021)
- [Understanding the Effect of Counterfactual Explanations on Trust and Reliance on AI for Human-AI Collaborative Clinical Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04375/) (2023)
- [XAIR: A Framework of Explainable AI in Augmented Reality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16292/) (2023)
- [Show or Suppress? Managing Input Uncertainty in Machine Learning Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09498/) (2021)
- [Explainable Activity Recognition for Smart Home Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09787/) (2021)
- [Learning Interpretable Rules for Scalable Data Representation and Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14336/) (2023)
- [Fast Interpretable Greedy-Tree Sums](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11931/) (2022)
- [Self-explaining deep models with logic rule reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07024/) (2022)
- [Improving Human Sequential Decision-Making with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.08454/) (2021)
- [Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11475/) (2023)
- [Learning Interpretable, High-Performing Policies for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02352/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We aim to produce predictive models that are not only accurate, but are also interpretable to human experts. Our models are decision lists, which consist of a series of if...then... statements (e.g., if high blood pressure, then stroke) that discretize a high-dimensional, multivariate feature space into a series of simple, readily interpretable decision statements. We introduce a generative model called Bayesian Rule Lists that yields a posterior distribution over possible decision lists. It employs a novel prior structure to encourage sparsity. Our experiments show that Bayesian Rule Lists has predictive accuracy on par with the current top algorithms for prediction in machine learning. Our method is motivated by recent developments in personalized medicine, and can be used to produce highly accurate and interpretable medical scoring systems. We demonstrate this by producing an alternative to the CHADS2 score, actively used in clinical practice for estimating the risk of stroke in patients that have atrial fibrillation. Our model is as interpretable as CHADS2, but more accurate.