# VEWS: A Wikipedia Vandal Early Warning System

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.01272 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.01272/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2015.

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Rank List Sensitivity of Recommender Systems to Interaction Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12686/) (2022)
- [PETGEN: Personalized Text Generation Attack on Deep Sequence Embedding-based Classification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06777/) (2021)
- [Node-Time Conditional Prompt Learning In Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13937/) (2024)
- [Signed Graph Neural Networks: A Frequency Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07323/) (2022)
- [SGPT: Few-Shot Prompt Tuning for Signed Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12155/) (2024)
- [Attention-Based Vandalism Detection in OpenStreetMap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.10406/) (2022)
- [RuDi: Explaining Behavior Sequence Models by Automatic Statistics Generation and Rule Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07211/) (2022)
- [Robust Fraud Detection via Supervised Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10055/) (2023)
- [Interpretable classification of wiki-review streams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18335/) (2024)
- [Hoaxpedia: A Unified Wikipedia Hoax Articles Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02175/) (2024)
- [ROBAD: Robust Adversary-aware Local-Global Attended Bad Actor Detection Sequential Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15067/) (2025)
- [Event-Aware Prompt Learning for Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11339/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of detecting vandals on Wikipedia before any human or known vandalism detection system reports flagging potential vandals so that such users can be presented early to Wikipedia administrators. We leverage multiple classical ML approaches, but develop 3 novel sets of features. Our Wikipedia Vandal Behavior (WVB) approach uses a novel set of user editing patterns as features to classify some users as vandals. Our Wikipedia Transition Probability Matrix (WTPM) approach uses a set of features derived from a transition probability matrix and then reduces it via a neural net auto-encoder to classify some users as vandals. The VEWS approach merges the previous two approaches. Without using any information (e.g. reverts) provided by other users, these algorithms each have over 85% classification accuracy. Moreover, when temporal recency is considered, accuracy goes to almost 90%. We carry out detailed experiments on a new data set we have created consisting of about 33K Wikipedia users (including both a black list and a white list of editors) and containing 770K edits. We describe specific behaviors that distinguish between vandals and non-vandals. We show that VEWS beats ClueBot NG and STiki, the best known algorithms today for vandalism detection. Moreover, VEWS detects far more vandals than ClueBot NG and on average, detects them 2.39 edits before ClueBot NG when both detect the vandal. However, we show that the combination of VEWS and ClueBot NG can give a fully automated vandal early warning system with even higher accuracy.