# Do Artificial Reinforcement-Learning Agents Matter Morally?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8233 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.8233/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2014.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Can a Machine be Conscious? Towards Universal Criteria for Machine Consciousness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15369/) (2024)
- [The History of AI Rights Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.04714/) (2022)
- [Some[Body] Must Receive That Pain for Agent Accountability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16872/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial reinforcement learning (RL) is a widely used technique in artificial intelligence that provides a general method for training agents to perform a wide variety of behaviours. RL as used in computer science has striking parallels to reward and punishment learning in animal and human brains. I argue that present-day artificial RL agents have a very small but nonzero degree of ethical importance. This is particularly plausible for views according to which sentience comes in degrees based on the abilities and complexities of minds, but even binary views on consciousness should assign nonzero probability to RL programs having morally relevant experiences. While RL programs are not a top ethical priority today, they may become more significant in the coming decades as RL is increasingly applied to industry, robotics, video games, and other areas. I encourage scientists, philosophers, and citizens to begin a conversation about our ethical duties to reduce the harm that we inflict on powerless, voiceless RL agents.