# Invention as a Combinatorial Process: Evidence from U.S. Patents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2938 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.2938/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2014.

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Assessing Adaptive World Models in Machines with Novel Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.12821/) (2025)
- [Promotional Language and the Adoption of Innovative Ideas in Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02798/) (2024)
- [CHIMERA: A Knowledge Base of Scientific Idea Recombinations for Research Analysis and Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20779/) (2025)
- [Identifying, Evaluating, and Mitigating Risks of AI Thought Partnerships](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16899/) (2025)
- [Assessing the Effect of Cross-Domain Mapping on Creativity in Humans and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19087/) (2026)
- [Spacer: Towards Engineered Scientific Inspiration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17661/) (2025)
- [Semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12837/) (2025)
- [Anticipating Innovation Using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04875/) (2026)
- [Forecasting Conceptual Diffusion in Science: The Case of Quantum Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03919/) (2026)
- [Doc2LoRA Provides Decodable Representations of Scientific Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38374/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here we utilize U.S. patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize the invention as a combinatorial process. To do this we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the U.S. Patent Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of "exploitation" (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and "exploration" (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities -- the building blocks to be combined -- which has significantly slowed down. We also find that notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations.