# Learning from networked examples

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2600 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.2600/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2014.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Generalization bounds for learning under graph-dependence: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13534/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many machine learning algorithms are based on the assumption that training examples are drawn independently. However, this assumption does not hold anymore when learning from a networked sample because two or more training examples may share some common objects, and hence share the features of these shared objects. We show that the classic approach of ignoring this problem potentially can have a harmful effect on the accuracy of statistics, and then consider alternatives. One of these is to only use independent examples, discarding other information. However, this is clearly suboptimal. We analyze sample error bounds in this networked setting, providing significantly improved results. An important component of our approach is formed by efficient sample weighting schemes, which leads to novel concentration inequalities.
