# Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4578 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1402.4578/

## Key facts

- Cited by 64 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2014.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 64)

- [MMLongBench-Doc: Benchmarking Long-context Document Understanding with Visualizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01523/) (2024)
- [Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03230/) (2024)
- [Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00176/) (2021)
- [Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14634/) (2024)
- [Natural Language Processing in the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12039/) (2023)
- [Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12857/) (2024)
- [Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08565/) (2024)
- [Keyphrase Generation for Scientific Document Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14726/) (2021)
- [ACLSum: A New Dataset for Aspect-based Summarization of Scientific Publications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05303/) (2024)
- [SciReviewGen: A Large-scale Dataset for Automatic Literature Review Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15186/) (2023)
- [LLMs4Synthesis: Leveraging Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18812/) (2024)
- [X-SCITLDR: Cross-Lingual Extreme Summarization of Scholarly Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15051/) (2022)
- [Cross-Domain Multi-Task Learning for Sequential Sentence Classification in Research Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06008/) (2021)
- [From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11343/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models for Scholarly Ontology Generation: An Extensive Analysis in the Engineering Field](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08258/) (2024)
- [Computer Science Named Entity Recognition in the Open Research Knowledge Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14579/) (2022)
- [Does the Market of Citations Reward Reproducible Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03829/) (2022)
- [Zero-shot Entailment of Leaderboards for Empirical AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16835/) (2023)
- [Good Idea or Not, Representation of LLM Could Tell](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13712/) (2024)
- [Knowledge-Centric Templatic Views of Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06945/) (2024)
- [The complementary contributions of academia and industry to AI research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10268/) (2024)
- [KG-CTG: Citation Generation through Knowledge Graph-guided Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09763/) (2024)
- [Streamlining Systematic Reviews: A Novel Application of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15247/) (2024)
- [Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15031/) (2025)
- [SciRAG: Adaptive, Citation-Aware, and Outline-Guided Retrieval and Synthesis for Scientific Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14362/) (2025)
- [SciPostGen: Bridging the Gap between Scientific Papers and Poster Layouts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.22490/) (2025)
- [Keyword Extraction in Scientific Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01888/) (2022)
- [Knowledge Graph Induction enabling Recommending and Trend Analysis: A Corporate Research Community Use Case](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05188/) (2022)
- [AceMap: Knowledge Discovery through Academic Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02576/) (2024)
- [SEAGraph: Unveiling the Whole Story of Paper Review Comments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11939/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many studies in information science have looked at the growth of science. In this study, we re-examine the question of the growth of science. To do this we (i) use current data up to publication year 2012 and (ii) analyse it across all disciplines and also separately for the natural sciences and for the medical and health sciences. Furthermore, the data are analysed with an advanced statistical technique - segmented regression analysis - which can identify specific segments with similar growth rates in the history of science. The study is based on two different sets of bibliometric data: (1) The number of publications held as source items in the Web of Science (WoS, Thomson Reuters) per publication year and (2) the number of cited references in the publications of the source items per cited reference year. We have looked at the rate at which science has grown since the mid-1600s. In our analysis of cited references we identified three growth phases in the development of science, which each led to growth rates tripling in comparison with the previous phase: from less than 1% up to the middle of the 18th century, to 2 to 3% up to the period between the two world wars and 8 to 9% to 2012.