# Irrelevant Vertices for the Planar Disjoint Paths Problem

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.2378 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.2378/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2013.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [From Width-Based Model Checking to Width-Based Automated Theorem Proving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10995/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The Disjoint Paths Problem asks, given a graph G and a set of pairs of terminals (s1,t1),ldots,(sk,tk), whether there is a collection of k pairwise vertex-disjoint paths linking si and ti, for i=1,ldots,k. In their f(k)· n3 algorithm for this problem, Robertson and Seymour introduced the irrelevant vertex technique according to which in every instance of treewidth greater than g(k) there is an "irrelevant" vertex whose removal creates an equivalent instance of the problem. This fact is based on the celebrated Unique Linkage Theorem, whose - very technical - proof gives a function g(k) that is responsible for an immense parameter dependence in the running time of the algorithm. In this paper we give a new and self-contained proof of this result that strongly exploits the combinatorial properties of planar graphs and achieves g(k)=O(k3/2· 2k). Our bound is radically better than the bounds known for general graphs.