# On the Parameterized Complexity of Reconfiguration Problems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2409 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1308.2409/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2013.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Reconfiguring Shortest Paths in Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07499/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present the first results on the parameterized complexity of reconfiguration problems, where a reconfiguration version of an optimization problem Q takes as input two feasible solutions S and T and determines if there is a sequence of em reconfiguration steps that can be applied to transform S into T such that each step results in a feasible solution to Q. For most of the results in this paper, S and T are subsets of vertices of a given graph and a reconfiguration step adds or deletes a vertex. Our study is motivated by recent results establishing that for most NP-hard problems, the classical complexity of reconfiguration is PSPACE-complete. We address the question for several important graph properties under two natural parameterizations: k, the size of the solutions, and ℓ, the length of the sequence of steps. Our first general result is an algorithmic paradigm, the em reconfiguration kernel, used to obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for the reconfiguration versions of sc Vertex Cover and, more generally, sc Bounded Hitting Set and sc Feedback Vertex Set, all parameterized by k. In contrast, we show that reconfiguring sc Unbounded Hitting Set is W[2]-hard when parameterized by k+ℓ. We also demonstrate the W[1]-hardness of the reconfiguration versions of a large class of maximization problems parameterized by k+ℓ, and of their corresponding deletion problems parameterized by ℓ; in doing so, we show that there exist problems in FPT when parameterized by k, but whose reconfiguration versions are W[1]-hard when parameterized by k+ℓ.