{"list":"other","total":61,"rows":[{"id":"1904.09675","title":"BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT","created":"2019-04-21","cited_by_count":5512},{"id":"2303.16634","title":"G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment","created":"2023-03-29","cited_by_count":2276},{"id":"2411.15594","title":"A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2024-11-23","cited_by_count":1423},{"id":"2404.04475","title":"Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators","created":"2024-04-06","cited_by_count":897},{"id":"2505.08775","title":"HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Health","created":"2025-05-13","cited_by_count":429},{"id":"2402.10669","title":"Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biases","created":"2024-02-16","cited_by_count":323},{"id":"2504.01848","title":"PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research","created":"2025-04-02","cited_by_count":321},{"id":"2410.12784","title":"JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges","created":"2024-10-16","cited_by_count":318},{"id":"2110.00976","title":"LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English","created":"2021-10-03","cited_by_count":310},{"id":"2406.07791","title":"Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2024-06-12","cited_by_count":269},{"id":"2506.11763","title":"DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents","created":"2025-06-13","cited_by_count":248},{"id":"2402.14016","title":"Is LLM-as-a-Judge Robust? Investigating Universal Adversarial Attacks on Zero-shot LLM Assessment","created":"2024-02-21","cited_by_count":126},{"id":"1911.12011","title":"JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Dataset","created":"2019-11-27","cited_by_count":116},{"id":"2407.18370","title":"Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreement","created":"2024-07-25","cited_by_count":105},{"id":"2406.05761","title":"The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models","created":"2024-06-09","cited_by_count":93},{"id":"2310.10076","title":"Verbosity Bias in Preference Labeling by Large Language Models","created":"2023-10-16","cited_by_count":91},{"id":"2511.07685","title":"ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agents","created":"2025-11-10","cited_by_count":84},{"id":"2501.10970","title":"The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs","created":"2025-01-19","cited_by_count":74},{"id":"2312.03748","title":"Applying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoring","created":"2023-11-30","cited_by_count":69},{"id":"2507.08794","title":"One Token to Fool LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2025-07-11","cited_by_count":60},{"id":"2412.17259","title":"LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domain","created":"2024-12-23","cited_by_count":59},{"id":"2412.12509","title":"Can You Trust LLM Judgments? Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2024-12-17","cited_by_count":56},{"id":"2503.05061","title":"No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Grounding","created":"2025-03-07","cited_by_count":54},{"id":"2505.12864","title":"LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams","created":"2025-05-19","cited_by_count":54},{"id":"2410.07137","title":"Cheating Automatic LLM Benchmarks: Null Models Achieve High Win Rates","created":"2024-10-09","cited_by_count":45},{"id":"2503.05142","title":"RocketEval: Efficient Automated LLM Evaluation via Grading Checklist","created":"2025-03-07","cited_by_count":39},{"id":"2508.18076","title":"Neither Valid nor Reliable? Investigating the Use of LLMs as Judges","created":"2025-08-25","cited_by_count":39},{"id":"2510.27106","title":"Rating Roulette: Self-Inconsistency in LLM-As-A-Judge Frameworks","created":"2025-10-31","cited_by_count":38},{"id":"2410.03775","title":"Beyond correlation: The Impact of Human Uncertainty in Measuring the Effectiveness of Automatic Evaluation and LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2024-10-03","cited_by_count":31},{"id":"2606.19544","title":"Reliability without Validity: A Systematic, Large-Scale Evaluation of LLM-as-a-Judge Models Across Agreement, Consistency, and Bias","created":"2026-06-17","cited_by_count":28},{"id":"2503.05965","title":"Validating LLM-as-a-Judge Systems under Rating Indeterminacy","created":"2025-03-07","cited_by_count":25},{"id":"2210.07544","title":"Legal Case Document Summarization: Extractive and Abstractive Methods and their Evaluation","created":"2022-10-14","cited_by_count":24},{"id":"2510.18941","title":"ProfBench: Multi-Domain Rubrics requiring Professional Knowledge to Answer and Judge","created":"2025-10-21","cited_by_count":24},{"id":"2502.19981","title":"The Lookahead Limitation: Why Multi-Operand Addition is Hard for LLMs","created":"2025-02-27","cited_by_count":15},{"id":"2601.16669","title":"PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice","created":"2026-01-23","cited_by_count":15},{"id":"2504.21202","title":"Automatic Legal Writing Evaluation of LLMs","created":"2025-04-29","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2603.20882","title":"RubricRAG: Towards Interpretable and Reliable LLM Evaluation via Domain Knowledge Retrieval for Rubric Generation","created":"2026-03-21","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2510.07243","title":"LeMAJ (Legal LLM-as-a-Judge): Bridging Legal Reasoning and LLM Evaluation","created":"2025-10-08","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2410.13456","title":"Unlocking Legal Knowledge: A Multilingual Dataset for Judicial Summarization in Switzerland","created":"2024-10-17","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2601.08654","title":"From Rubrics to Reliable Scores: Evidence-Grounded Text Evaluation with LLM Judges","created":"2026-01-13","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2510.01474","title":"AIReg-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models That Assess AI Regulation Compliance","created":"2025-10-01","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2601.08843","title":"Rubric-Conditioned LLM Grading: Alignment, Uncertainty, and Robustness","created":"2025-12-21","cited_by_count":5},{"id":"2605.25240","title":"JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment","created":"2026-05-24","cited_by_count":5},{"id":"2507.19980","title":"Exploring LLM Autoscoring Reliability in Large-Scale Writing Assessments Using Generalizability Theory","created":"2025-07-26","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2510.09030","title":"Automated Refinement of Essay Scoring Rubrics for Language Models via Reflect-and-Revise","created":"2025-10-10","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2510.05162","title":"Artificial-Intelligence Grading Assistance for Handwritten Components of a Calculus Exam","created":"2025-10-04","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"2511.04205","title":"LLM-as-a-Judge is Bad, Based on AI Attempting the Exam Qualifying for the Member of the Polish National Board of Appeal","created":"2025-11-06","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"2512.24572","title":"Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs' Legal Reasoning Capabilities","created":"2025-12-31","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"2412.15902","title":"On the Suitability of pre-trained foundational LLMs for Analysis in German Legal Education","created":"2024-12-20","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2512.14561","title":"Agreement Between Large Language Models and Human Raters in Essay Scoring: A Research Synthesis","created":"2025-12-16","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2604.13583","title":"BenGER Platform: A Collaborative Web Platform for End-to-End Benchmarking of German Legal Tasks","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2605.08437","title":"Magis-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Magistrate-Level Legal Tasks","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2606.09389","title":"LexRubric: A Rubric-Guided Diagnostic Benchmark for Open-Ended Legal Tasks","created":"2026-06-08","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2512.09434","title":"CourtPressGER: A German Court Decision to Press Release Summarization Dataset","created":"2025-12-10","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2604.20726","title":"Exploiting LLM-as-a-Judge Disposition on Free Text Legal QA via Prompt Optimization","created":"2026-04-22","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2605.25652","title":"A Two-Phase Stability Study of LLM Judges and Bar Council Examiners on Thai Bar-Exam Free-Form Essays","created":"2026-05-25","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2606.03090","title":"\"**Important** You should give me full credits!\": Exploring Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM-Based Automatic Grading Systems","created":"2026-06-02","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2608.02621","title":"Knowing the Form, Not the Function: Automatically Auditing Answer--Authority Decoupling in Legal Benchmarks","created":"2026-07-03","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2608.29517","title":"LLM Judges as Raters: A Pre-Registered Audit of Severity, Halo, Reliability, and Version Instability in LLM Essay Scoring on Public Corpora","created":"2026-08-30","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2610.00609","title":"Legal Research Bench: Measuring End-to-End Reliability in Long-Horizon Legal Research Agents","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2610.13303","title":"Agreement Without Alignment: Label-Free Rubric Clarification Increases LLM-Judge Consensus but Not Agreement with Humans","created":"2026-10-09","cited_by_count":1}],"next_cursor":null}