{"list":"other","total":139,"rows":[{"id":"2305.17926","title":"Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators","created":"2023-05-29","cited_by_count":1085},{"id":"2408.06292","title":"The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery","created":"2024-08-12","cited_by_count":1071},{"id":"2402.00838","title":"OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models","created":"2024-02-01","cited_by_count":613},{"id":"2402.00159","title":"Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research","created":"2024-01-31","cited_by_count":483},{"id":"2303.13408","title":"Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense","created":"2023-03-23","cited_by_count":429},{"id":"2402.07867","title":"PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models","created":"2024-02-12","cited_by_count":267},{"id":"2307.01850","title":"Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MAD","created":"2023-07-04","cited_by_count":250},{"id":"2404.07738","title":"ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models","created":"2024-04-11","cited_by_count":210},{"id":"2310.01783","title":"Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis","created":"2023-10-03","cited_by_count":200},{"id":"2304.02819","title":"GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers","created":"2023-04-06","cited_by_count":178},{"id":"2312.00506","title":"Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content","created":"2023-12-01","cited_by_count":167},{"id":"2403.07183","title":"Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews","created":"2024-03-11","cited_by_count":164},{"id":"2405.07940","title":"RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors","created":"2024-05-13","cited_by_count":163},{"id":"2411.00816","title":"CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review","created":"2024-10-28","cited_by_count":148},{"id":"2403.17710","title":"Optimization-based Prompt Injection Attack to LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2024-03-26","cited_by_count":143},{"id":"2510.22954","title":"Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond)","created":"2025-10-27","cited_by_count":141},{"id":"1804.09635","title":"A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applications","created":"2018-04-25","cited_by_count":136},{"id":"2402.14016","title":"Is LLM-as-a-Judge Robust? Investigating Universal Adversarial Attacks on Zero-shot LLM Assessment","created":"2024-02-21","cited_by_count":126},{"id":"2311.09807","title":"The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Text","created":"2023-11-16","cited_by_count":100},{"id":"2503.08569","title":"DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Process","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":100},{"id":"2404.05090","title":"How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapse","created":"2024-04-07","cited_by_count":79},{"id":"2406.07016","title":"Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary","created":"2024-06-11","cited_by_count":78},{"id":"2503.18102","title":"AgentRxiv: Towards Collaborative Autonomous Research","created":"2025-03-23","cited_by_count":72},{"id":"2405.02150","title":"The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates","created":"2024-05-03","cited_by_count":69},{"id":"2412.11948","title":"OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":65},{"id":"2406.16253","title":"LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":62},{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61},{"id":"2503.22708","title":"CodeScientist: End-to-End Semi-Automated Scientific Discovery with Code-based Experimentation","created":"2025-03-20","cited_by_count":57},{"id":"2404.17605","title":"Autonomous LLM-driven research from data to human-verifiable research papers","created":"2024-04-24","cited_by_count":53},{"id":"2412.01708","title":"Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review","created":"2024-12-02","cited_by_count":53},{"id":"2506.07962","title":"Correlated Errors in Large Language Models","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":45},{"id":"2110.07474","title":"MReD: A Meta-Review Dataset for Structure-Controllable Text Generation","created":"2021-10-14","cited_by_count":42},{"id":"2502.05151","title":"Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation","created":"2025-02-07","cited_by_count":42},{"id":"2405.20477","title":"Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistance","created":"2024-05-30","cited_by_count":33},{"id":"2407.12857","title":"Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis","created":"2024-07-09","cited_by_count":33},{"id":"2503.08506","title":"ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":32},{"id":"2601.13187","title":"Scientific production in the era of Large Language Models","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":32},{"id":"2506.05209","title":"The Common Pile v0.1: An 8TB Dataset of Public Domain and Openly Licensed Text","created":"2025-06-05","cited_by_count":31},{"id":"2506.07642","title":"TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Review","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":31},{"id":"2509.08713","title":"The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist Systems","created":"2025-09-10","cited_by_count":29},{"id":"2305.01498","title":"Summarizing Multiple Documents with Conversational Structure for Meta-Review Generation","created":"2023-05-02","cited_by_count":27},{"id":"2404.01907","title":"Humanizing Machine-Generated Content: Evading AI-Text Detection through Adversarial Attack","created":"2024-04-02","cited_by_count":27},{"id":"2505.11855","title":"When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research","created":"2025-05-17","cited_by_count":26},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25},{"id":"2502.11736","title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","created":"2025-02-17","cited_by_count":25},{"id":"2605.20025","title":"AutoResearchClaw: Self-Reinforcing Autonomous Research with Human-AI Collaboration","created":"2026-05-19","cited_by_count":25},{"id":"2310.05095","title":"How Reliable Are AI-Generated-Text Detectors? An Assessment Framework Using Evasive Soft Prompts","created":"2023-10-08","cited_by_count":23},{"id":"2410.03019","title":"Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review","created":"2024-10-03","cited_by_count":20},{"id":"2503.15772","title":"Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews","created":"2025-03-20","cited_by_count":20},{"id":"2508.10308","title":"ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RL","created":"2025-08-14","cited_by_count":19},{"id":"2509.09912","title":"When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review","created":"2025-09-12","cited_by_count":19},{"id":"2604.13940","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":19},{"id":"2502.16487","title":"All That Glitters is Not Novel: Plagiarism in AI Generated Research","created":"2025-02-23","cited_by_count":18},{"id":"2402.15589","title":"LLMs as Meta-Reviewers' Assistants: A Case Study","created":"2024-02-23","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"2411.03417","title":"Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment","created":"2024-11-05","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"2506.11113","title":"Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks","created":"2025-06-08","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"2605.03202","title":"Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation","created":"2026-05-04","cited_by_count":14},{"id":"2507.06185","title":"Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2025-07-08","cited_by_count":13},{"id":"2604.05018","title":"PaperOrchestra: A Multi-Agent Framework for Automated AI Research Paper Writing","created":"2026-04-06","cited_by_count":13},{"id":"2503.21717","title":"CLAIMCHECK: How Grounded are LLM Critiques of Scientific Papers?","created":"2025-03-27","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2508.10795","title":"Beyond \"Not Novel Enough\": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedback","created":"2025-08-14","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2511.04583","title":"Jr. AI Scientist and Its Risk Report: Autonomous Scientific Exploration from a Baseline Paper","created":"2025-11-06","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2512.06705","title":"Academic journals' AI policies fail to curb the surge in AI-assisted academic writing","created":"2025-12-07","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2504.20090","title":"Spark: A System for Scientifically Creative Idea Generation","created":"2025-04-25","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2505.16957","title":"Invisible Prompts, Visible Threats: Malicious Font Injection in External Resources for Large Language Models","created":"2025-05-22","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2508.21422","title":"Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework","created":"2025-08-29","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2509.13400","title":"Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews","created":"2025-09-16","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2603.14473","title":"AI Can Learn Scientific Taste","created":"2026-03-15","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2605.18661","title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2402.18005","title":"A Sentiment Consolidation Framework for Meta-Review Generation","created":"2024-02-28","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2505.15337","title":"Your Language Model Can Secretly Write Like Humans: Contrastive Paraphrase Attacks on LLM-Generated Text Detectors","created":"2025-05-21","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2510.13201","title":"Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferences","created":"2025-10-15","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2607.27191","title":"Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies","created":"2026-07-29","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2410.03658","title":"RAFT: Realistic Attacks to Fool Text Detectors","created":"2024-10-04","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2502.00690","title":"Dissecting Submission Limit in Desk-Rejections: A Mathematical Analysis of Fairness in AI Conference Policies","created":"2025-02-02","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2505.24523","title":"Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectors","created":"2025-05-30","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2510.12367","title":"LLM-REVal: Can We Trust LLM Reviewers Yet?","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2601.14171","title":"Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance","created":"2026-01-20","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2410.09770","title":"'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' Who will watch the watchmen? On Detecting AI-generated peer-reviews","created":"2024-10-13","cited_by_count":8},{"id":"2601.06884","title":"Paraphrasing Adversarial Attack on LLM-as-a-Reviewer","created":"2026-01-11","cited_by_count":8},{"id":"2605.16616","title":"MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility","created":"2026-05-15","cited_by_count":8},{"id":"2203.17239","title":"Cite-seeing and Reviewing: A Study on Citation Bias in Peer Review","created":"2022-03-31","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2505.11336","title":"XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI Collaboration","created":"2025-05-16","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2603.28589","title":"Towards a Medical AI Scientist","created":"2026-03-30","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2605.07723","title":"LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2407.12015","title":"The Great AI Witch Hunt: Reviewers Perception and (Mis)Conception of Generative AI in Research Writing","created":"2024-06-27","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2410.19230","title":"Humanizing the Machine: Proxy Attacks to Mislead LLM Detectors","created":"2024-10-25","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2508.20863","title":"Misleading Large Language Models used (or misused) in Scientific Peer-Reviewing via Hidden Prompt-Injection Attacks","created":"2025-08-28","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2512.10449","title":"When Reject Turns into Accept: Quantifying the Vulnerability of LLM-Based Scientific Reviewers to Indirect Prompt Injection","created":"2025-12-11","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2603.09723","title":"RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation","created":"2026-03-10","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2603.20450","title":"Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable","created":"2026-03-20","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2605.20668","title":"On the limits and opportunities of AI reviewers: Reviewing the reviews of Nature-family papers with 45 expert scientists","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2509.08604","title":"Memorization in Large Language Models in Medicine: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Implications","created":"2025-09-10","cited_by_count":5},{"id":"2511.01287","title":"\"Give a Positive Review Only\": An Early Investigation Into In-Paper Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for AI Reviewers","created":"2025-11-03","cited_by_count":5},{"id":"2505.21636","title":"The Feasibility of Topic-Based Watermarking on Academic Peer Reviews","created":"2025-05-27","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2509.14189","title":"AI and the Future of Academic Peer Review","created":"2025-09-17","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2602.11173","title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2602.13576","title":"Rubrics as an Attack Surface: Stealthy Preference Drift in LLM Judges","created":"2026-02-14","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2602.16136","title":"Retrieval Collapses When AI Pollutes the Web","created":"2026-02-18","cited_by_count":4}],"next_cursor":"100"}