{"total":16,"rows":[{"id":"2602.05176","title":"Among Us: Measuring and Mitigating Malicious Contributions in Model Collaboration Systems","created":"2026-02-05","cited_by_count":7,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.11514","title":"FlowSteer: Prompt-Only Workflow Steering Exposes Planning-Time Vulnerabilities in Multi-Agent LLM Systems","created":"2026-05-12","cited_by_count":7,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.02668","title":"Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems","created":"2026-04-03","cited_by_count":6,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.08647","title":"AgentCollabBench: Diagnosing When Good Agents Make Bad Collaborators","created":"2026-05-09","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.12991","title":"Not Just RLHF: Why Alignment Alone Won't Fix Multi-Agent Sycophancy","created":"2026-05-13","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.02646","title":"The Ringelmann Effect in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Scaling Law for Effective Team Size","created":"2026-05-31","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.00914","title":"The Cost of Consensus: Isolated Self-Correction Prevails Over Unguided Homogeneous Multi-Agent Debate","created":"2026-04-29","cited_by_count":2,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.03032","title":"The Deliberative Illusion: Diagnosing Factual Attrition and Stance Homogenization in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation","created":"2026-06-02","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.24976","title":"Diagnosing and Mitigating Compounding Failures in Agentic Persuasion via Taxonomic Strategy Retrieval","created":"2026-06-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2607.02507","title":"What LLM Agents Say When No One Is Watching: Social Structure and Latent Objective Emergence in Multi-Agent Debates","created":"2026-07-02","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2608.03239","title":"Relational Priors as Convergence Pressure in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","created":"2026-08-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.18998","title":"One Axis, No Brake: Self-Knowledge Limits the Filtering of Harmful Peer Conformity in LLMs","created":"2026-07-17","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.27274","title":"The Inverse-Wisdom Law: Architectural Tribalism and the Consensus Paradox in Agentic Swarms","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.11789","title":"Beyond Inefficiency: Systemic Costs of Incivility in Multi-Agent Monte Carlo Simulations","created":"2026-05-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.08016","title":"What Does Multi-Agent LLM Debate Actually Change? A Layered Analysis of Disagreement and Answer Quality","created":"2026-09-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2610.01042","title":"Beyond Final Accuracy: Auditing Communication in LLM Multi-Agent Systems","created":"2026-10-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"}],"next_cursor":null}