{"list":"other","total":65,"rows":[{"id":"2303.08774","title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","created":"2023-03-15","cited_by_count":18396},{"id":"2302.13971","title":"LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models","created":"2023-02-27","cited_by_count":14132},{"id":"2203.11171","title":"Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models","created":"2022-03-21","cited_by_count":5708},{"id":"2309.16609","title":"Qwen Technical Report","created":"2023-09-28","cited_by_count":3344},{"id":"2212.10560","title":"Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions","created":"2022-12-20","cited_by_count":2724},{"id":"2401.14196","title":"DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence","created":"2024-01-25","cited_by_count":1181},{"id":"2406.12793","title":"ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools","created":"2024-06-18","cited_by_count":1121},{"id":"2104.07567","title":"Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversation","created":"2021-04-15","cited_by_count":692},{"id":"2110.00976","title":"LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English","created":"2021-10-03","cited_by_count":310},{"id":"2304.08177","title":"Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpaca","created":"2023-04-17","cited_by_count":305},{"id":"2103.06268","title":"CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review","created":"2021-03-10","cited_by_count":236},{"id":"1906.02059","title":"Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English","created":"2019-06-05","cited_by_count":209},{"id":"2402.13446","title":"Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey","created":"2024-02-21","cited_by_count":205},{"id":"2104.08671","title":"When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Dataset","created":"2021-04-18","cited_by_count":201},{"id":"1807.02478","title":"CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Prediction","created":"2018-07-04","cited_by_count":170},{"id":"2301.03988","title":"SantaCoder: don't reach for the stars!","created":"2023-01-09","cited_by_count":170},{"id":"2403.03883","title":"SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Law","created":"2024-03-06","cited_by_count":142},{"id":"2212.09420","title":"Large Language Models Meet NL2Code: A Survey","created":"2022-12-19","cited_by_count":138},{"id":"2004.12158","title":"How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence","created":"2020-04-25","cited_by_count":129},{"id":"2312.03718","title":"Large Language Models in Law: A Survey","created":"2023-11-26","cited_by_count":128},{"id":"2306.16092","title":"Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecture","created":"2023-06-28","cited_by_count":122},{"id":"1911.12011","title":"JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Dataset","created":"2019-11-27","cited_by_count":116},{"id":"2207.00220","title":"Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset","created":"2022-07-01","cited_by_count":113},{"id":"2104.08398","title":"Re-TACRED: Addressing Shortcomings of the TACRED Dataset","created":"2021-04-16","cited_by_count":74},{"id":"2302.06100","title":"Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?","created":"2023-02-13","cited_by_count":73},{"id":"2404.04302","title":"CBR-RAG: Case-Based Reasoning for Retrieval Augmented Generation in LLMs for Legal Question Answering","created":"2024-04-04","cited_by_count":72},{"id":"2209.02970","title":"Fengshenbang 1.0: Being the Foundation of Chinese Cognitive Intelligence","created":"2022-09-07","cited_by_count":70},{"id":"2304.11370","title":"SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval","created":"2023-04-22","cited_by_count":62},{"id":"2110.00806","title":"Swiss-Judgment-Prediction: A Multilingual Legal Judgment Prediction Benchmark","created":"2021-10-02","cited_by_count":60},{"id":"2212.01326","title":"Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyer","created":"2022-12-02","cited_by_count":60},{"id":"2303.09136","title":"A Short Survey of Viewing Large Language Models in Legal Aspect","created":"2023-03-16","cited_by_count":52},{"id":"2310.09241","title":"Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration","created":"2023-10-13","cited_by_count":52},{"id":"2206.05224","title":"A Multi-Task Benchmark for Korean Legal Language Understanding and Judgement Prediction","created":"2022-06-10","cited_by_count":44},{"id":"2410.21306","title":"Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challenges","created":"2024-10-25","cited_by_count":42},{"id":"2403.02959","title":"AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation","created":"2024-03-05","cited_by_count":40},{"id":"2407.19584","title":"SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domain","created":"2024-07-28","cited_by_count":39},{"id":"2307.08321","title":"Legal Syllogism Prompting: Teaching Large Language Models for Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2023-07-17","cited_by_count":38},{"id":"2310.17609","title":"LeCaRDv2: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Case Retrieval Dataset","created":"2023-10-26","cited_by_count":38},{"id":"2406.11149","title":"GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theory","created":"2024-06-17","cited_by_count":37},{"id":"2407.21065","title":"LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System","created":"2024-07-27","cited_by_count":37},{"id":"2203.08556","title":"LEVEN: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Event Detection Dataset","created":"2022-03-16","cited_by_count":36},{"id":"2301.00876","title":"MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understanding","created":"2023-01-02","cited_by_count":33},{"id":"1912.09156","title":"CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehension","created":"2019-12-19","cited_by_count":26},{"id":"2402.06894","title":"GenTranslate: Large Language Models are Generative Multilingual Speech and Machine Translators","created":"2024-02-10","cited_by_count":22},{"id":"2207.04182","title":"Explainable Legal Case Matching via Inverse Optimal Transport-based Rationale Extraction","created":"2022-07-09","cited_by_count":21},{"id":"2312.05762","title":"Multi-Defendant Legal Judgment Prediction via Hierarchical Reasoning","created":"2023-12-10","cited_by_count":19},{"id":"2406.17186","title":"CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":18},{"id":"2311.04911","title":"From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systems","created":"2023-11-01","cited_by_count":17},{"id":"2407.01964","title":"Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2024-07-02","cited_by_count":17},{"id":"2306.09237","title":"One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support","created":"2023-06-15","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"2403.18405","title":"Leveraging Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrieval","created":"2024-03-27","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"2403.18365","title":"BLADE: Enhancing Black-box Large Language Models with Small Domain-Specific Models","created":"2024-03-27","cited_by_count":15},{"id":"2406.19760","title":"Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case Reformulation","created":"2024-06-28","cited_by_count":15},{"id":"2312.09591","title":"Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative Approach","created":"2023-12-15","cited_by_count":14},{"id":"2410.02507","title":"Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration","created":"2024-10-03","cited_by_count":14},{"id":"2403.04454","title":"Low-Resource Court Judgment Summarization for Common Law Systems","created":"2024-03-07","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2409.18454","title":"Leveraging Long-Context Large Language Models for Multi-Document Understanding and Summarization in Enterprise Applications","created":"2024-09-27","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2410.09527","title":"LexSumm and LexT5: Benchmarking and Modeling Legal Summarization Tasks in English","created":"2024-10-12","cited_by_count":8},{"id":"2309.05501","title":"Black-Box Analysis: GPTs Across Time in Legal Textual Entailment Task","created":"2023-09-11","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2407.19041","title":"Optimizing Numerical Estimation and Operational Efficiency in the Legal Domain through Large Language Models","created":"2024-07-26","cited_by_count":5},{"id":"2501.00097","title":"CaseSumm: A Large-Scale Dataset for Long-Context Summarization from U.S. Supreme Court Opinions","created":"2024-12-30","cited_by_count":5},{"id":"2310.01271","title":"LEEC: A Legal Element Extraction Dataset with an Extensive Domain-Specific Label System","created":"2023-10-02","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2407.05786","title":"Large Language Models for Judicial Entity Extraction: A Comparative Study","created":"2024-07-08","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2401.17897","title":"Employing Label Models on ChatGPT Answers Improves Legal Text Entailment Performance","created":"2024-01-31","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2406.15809","title":"LaMSUM: Amplifying Voices Against Harassment through LLM Guided Extractive Summarization of User Incident Reports","created":"2024-06-22","cited_by_count":2}],"next_cursor":null}