{"total":24,"rows":[{"id":"2511.07784","title":"Can LLM Agents Really Debate? A Controlled Study of Multi-Agent Debate in Logical Reasoning","created":"2025-11-11","cited_by_count":29,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2510.01499","title":"Beyond Majority Voting: LLM Aggregation by Leveraging Higher-Order Information","created":"2025-10-01","cited_by_count":26,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.19921","title":"Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity","created":"2026-01-09","cited_by_count":18,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2603.20215","title":"Multi-Agent Debate with Memory Masking","created":"2026-03-03","cited_by_count":10,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2603.20640","title":"Hear Both Sides: Efficient Multi-Agent Debate via Diversity-Aware Message Retention","created":"2026-03-21","cited_by_count":4,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2606.01667","title":"ATLAS: Agentic Test-time Learning-to-Allocate Scaling","created":"2026-06-01","cited_by_count":4,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2603.02479","title":"PRISM: Pushing the Frontier of Deep Think via Process Reward Model-Guided Inference","created":"2026-03-03","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2603.06801","title":"Breaking the Martingale Curse: Multi-Agent Debate via Asymmetric Cognitive Potential Energy","created":"2026-03-06","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2510.04488","title":"Multi-Agent Collaborative Intelligence: Dual-Dial Control for Reliable LLM Reasoning","created":"2025-10-06","cited_by_count":2,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.22297","title":"Learning from Self-Debate: Preparing Reasoning Models for Multi-Agent Debate","created":"2026-01-29","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.15972","title":"Weak-Link Optimization for Multi-Agent Reasoning and Collaboration","created":"2026-04-17","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2606.16047","title":"From Argument Components to Graphs: A Multi-Agent Debate with Confidence Gating for Argument Relations","created":"2026-06-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2606.29654","title":"Budgeted Act-or-Defer Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation with Local Reliability Bounds","created":"2026-06-28","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.01113","title":"CARE: Privacy-Compliant Agentic Reasoning with Evidence Discordance","created":"2026-04-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2605.08478","title":"When Independent Sampling Outperforms Agentic Reasoning","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2605.26849","title":"Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation for Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2607.12480","title":"TRACE: An Operational Reasoning Schema for Auditable Agentic Commitments","created":"2026-07-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2607.28576","title":"Sample More, Reflect Less: Self-Refine and Reflexion Lose to Repeated Sampling at Equal Token Cost, from 1.5B to 7B","created":"2026-07-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2609.33974","title":"Beyond Solo and Consistency: Vindicating Multi-Agent Debate via Conditional Progressive Pruning","created":"2026-09-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2609.39146","title":"MADBench: Benchmarking the Security of Multi-Agent Debate","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2609.39632","title":"Towards Better Exploration in Sequential Test-Time Scaling","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2610.16343","title":"Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning via Confidence-Guided Adaptive Debate","created":"2026-10-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2610.18240","title":"Beyond Answer Sharing: TrueMAD for Targeted Peer Engagement in Multi-Agent Debate","created":"2026-10-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2610.19458","title":"PFedMA: Who Should Join Next as Federated Multi-Agent Orchestration Evolves?","created":"2026-10-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"}],"next_cursor":null}