{"total":19,"rows":[{"id":"2604.23478","title":"JudgeSense: A Benchmark for Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-as-a-Judge Systems","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2604.22937","title":"AutoPyVerifier: Learning Compact Executable Verifiers for Large Language Model Outputs","created":"2026-04-24","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2603.29403","title":"Security in LLM-as-a-Judge: A Comprehensive SoK","created":"2026-03-31","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2604.05593","title":"Label Effects: Shared Heuristic Reliance in Trust Assessment by Humans and LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2026-04-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2602.19844","title":"LLM-enabled Applications Require System-Level Threat Monitoring","created":"2026-02-23","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2601.11783","title":"The Stability Trap: Evaluating the Reliability of LLM-Based Instruction Adherence Auditing","created":"2026-01-16","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.05995","title":"The Model Agreed, But Didn't Learn: Diagnosing Surface Compliance in Large Language Models","created":"2026-04-07","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.21748","title":"RankJudge: A Multi-Turn LLM-as-a-Judge Synthetic Benchmark Generator","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.31351","title":"VIABLE: A Visually Impaired Assistance Benchmark for VLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation","created":"2026-05-29","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2511.03047","title":"Unsupervised Evaluation of Multi-Turn Objective-Driven Interactions","created":"2025-11-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.12634","title":"RPRA: Predicting an LLM-Judge for Efficient but Performant Inference","created":"2026-04-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.03858","title":"MCJudgeBench: A Benchmark for Constraint-Level Judge Evaluation in Multi-Constraint Instruction Following","created":"2026-05-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.30521","title":"Evaluating using Mock Tool Calls to Quarantine Untrusted Prompt Inputs","created":"2026-05-28","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.06422","title":"Sharding Prevents LLM Oversight Failures and Adversarial Exploitation","created":"2026-08-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.21097","title":"When Trust Meets Truth: Trust-Truth Separability in LLM-as-Judge","created":"2026-08-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11067","title":"When Noise Fabricates Bias: The Fragility of LLM-as-a-Judge Bias Measurement under Noisy Text","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.22599","title":"MAWILE: Multi-Axis Workbench for Inspecting LLM Evaluators","created":"2026-09-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.24516","title":"LLJ Cards: Best practices for the Use of LLMs as Judges","created":"2026-09-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.05094","title":"How Much Do LLM-as-a-Judge Design Choices Matter? A Systematic Comparison of Prompt Designs, Rating Scales, and Models","created":"2026-10-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}