{"total":20,"rows":[{"id":"2509.23808","title":"Semantic-Space Exploration and Exploitation in RLVR for LLM Reasoning","created":"2025-09-28","cited_by_count":17,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2505.17267","title":"GreekBarBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Free-Text Legal Reasoning and Citations","created":"2025-05-22","cited_by_count":15,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2506.19467","title":"Can Reasoning Help Large Language Models Capture Human Annotator Disagreement?","created":"2025-06-24","cited_by_count":10,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.13433","title":"Who Endorsed It? Measuring Authority Bias Across Expertise Levels in Language Models","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":8,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2608.31075","title":"Scaling Large Reasoning Models beyond Human Supervision: A Path toward Superintelligence","created":"2026-08-31","cited_by_count":5,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.08134","title":"How Reliable are Confidence Estimators for Large Reasoning Models? A Systematic Benchmark on High-Stakes Domains","created":"2026-01-13","cited_by_count":4,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2509.00529","title":"Modeling Motivated Reasoning in Law: Evaluating Strategic Role Conditioning in LLM Summarization","created":"2025-08-30","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2509.22472","title":"Evaluating the Limits of Large Language Models in Multilingual Legal Reasoning","created":"2025-09-26","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2512.24572","title":"Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs' Legal Reasoning Capabilities","created":"2025-12-31","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.13183","title":"OpenExempt: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Legal Reasoning and a Framework for Creating Custom Benchmarks on Demand","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2608.01292","title":"CrossLex: A Source-Grounded Benchmark for Cross-Jurisdictional Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models","created":"2026-08-02","cited_by_count":2,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2605.29738","title":"Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions","created":"2026-05-28","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2608.18931","title":"Test-Time Scaling in the Wild: Why Exploitation, Not Exploration, Is the Bottleneck","created":"2026-08-19","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2510.25623","title":"Evaluating the Role of Verifiers in Test-Time Scaling for Legal Reasoning Tasks","created":"2025-10-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2603.26332","title":"CALRK-Bench: Evaluating Context-Aware Legal Reasoning in Korean Law","created":"2026-03-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.23730","title":"Expert Evaluation of LLM's Open-Ended Legal Reasoning on the Japanese Bar Exam Writing Task","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.23809","title":"LegalDrill: Diagnosis-Driven Synthesis for Legal Reasoning in Small Language Models","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2605.02472","title":"Accurate Legal Reasoning at Scale: Neuro-Symbolic Offloading and Structural Auditability for Robust Legal Adjudication","created":"2026-05-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2605.28183","title":"BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law","created":"2026-05-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2606.06941","title":"Quantum-Inspired Trace-Augmented Evidence Selection for Reasoning over Structured Hypothesis Spaces","created":"2026-06-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"}],"next_cursor":null}