{"total":17,"rows":[{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2605.18661","title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2507.11810","title":"Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator","created":"2025-07-16","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2601.14171","title":"Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance","created":"2026-01-20","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15715","title":"RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind","created":"2026-01-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2509.25179","title":"NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation","created":"2025-09-29","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2602.11173","title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27360","title":"Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19998","title":"What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.07905","title":"CoCoReviewBench: A Completeness- and Correctness-Oriented Benchmark for AI Reviewers","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.29815","title":"PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing","created":"2026-05-28","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.03571","title":"PatRe: A Full-Stage Office Action and Rebuttal Generation Benchmark for Patent Examination","created":"2026-05-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22681","title":"From peer review nuances to best practices","created":"2026-07-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.09076","title":"ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generation","created":"2026-09-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11460","title":"ReGround: Grounding Reviewer Comments in Multimodal Evidence","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.18820","title":"Read the Room Before Your Model Generates","created":"2026-10-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}