{"total":33,"rows":[{"id":"2509.04484","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors","created":"2025-08-31","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2509.19326","title":"Unveiling the Merits and Defects of LLMs in Automatic Review Generation for Scientific Papers","created":"2025-09-13","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2603.14473","title":"AI Can Learn Scientific Taste","created":"2026-03-15","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2605.18661","title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2506.08134","title":"Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2510.12367","title":"LLM-REVal: Can We Trust LLM Reviewers Yet?","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2601.06884","title":"Paraphrasing Adversarial Attack on LLM-as-a-Reviewer","created":"2026-01-11","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2605.20668","title":"On the limits and opportunities of AI reviewers: Reviewing the reviews of Nature-family papers with 45 expert scientists","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2505.21537","title":"OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models","created":"2025-05-24","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2512.05925","title":"To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysis","created":"2025-12-05","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2510.21192","title":"Gen-Review: A Large-scale Dataset of AI-Generated (and Human-written) Peer Reviews","created":"2025-10-24","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2606.24177","title":"Agon: An Autonomous Large-Scale Omnidisciplinary Research System Built on Prompt Economy","created":"2026-06-23","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15445","title":"Reflexis: Supporting Reflexivity and Rigor in Collaborative Qualitative Analysis through Design for Deliberation","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2601.19916","title":"PaperAudit-Bench: Benchmarking Error Detection in Research Papers for Critical Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-01-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2603.17588","title":"From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation","created":"2026-03-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.07905","title":"CoCoReviewBench: A Completeness- and Correctness-Oriented Benchmark for AI Reviewers","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2505.18942","title":"Language Models Should be Used to Surface the Unwritten Code of Science and Society","created":"2025-05-25","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.13817","title":"What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?","created":"2026-02-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.15849","title":"IntelliAsk: Learning to Ask High-Quality Research Questions via RLVR","created":"2026-01-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.00323","title":"Large Language Models in the Abuse Detection Pipeline","created":"2026-03-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.16623","title":"To Trust or Not to Trust: Authors' Response to AI-based Reviews","created":"2026-05-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2512.16491","title":"Best Practices For Empirical Meta-Algorithmic Research: Guidelines from the COSEAL Research Network","created":"2025-12-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.06027","title":"AI-Assisted Authoring for Transparent, Data-Driven Documents","created":"2025-10-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.20214","title":"Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge","created":"2026-03-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27204","title":"GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-based Graph Evidence Expansion","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.10584","title":"HexEval: An Evidence-Driven Hexagonal Framework for Multidimensional Scholar Assessment","created":"2026-08-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14625","title":"Local AI pre-screening for human triple-blind peer review in health sciences","created":"2026-07-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.03580","title":"HalluPeer: A Taxonomy-driven Benchmark for Detecting Hallucinations in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2026-09-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11460","title":"ReGround: Grounding Reviewer Comments in Multimodal Evidence","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.02841","title":"How Robust Is Multimodal Claim Verification to LLM Rewriting?","created":"2026-10-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.11877","title":"How Is Automated Research Evaluated? A Survey of Benchmarks and Evaluation Practices","created":"2026-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}