{"total":24,"rows":[{"id":"2512.00193","title":"A Rosetta Stone for AI Benchmarks","created":"2025-11-28","cited_by_count":36,"area":null},{"id":"2504.21303","title":"Confidence in Large Language Model Evaluation: A Bayesian Approach to Limited-Sample Challenges","created":"2025-04-30","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2602.07267","title":"BRIDGE: Predicting Human Task Completion Time From Model Performance","created":"2026-02-06","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2510.04051","title":"Toward a unified framework for data-efficient evaluation of large language models","created":"2025-10-05","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2506.10378","title":"Discovering Hierarchical Latent Capabilities of Language Models via Causal Representation Learning","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2607.15190","title":"Can We Trust Item Response Theory for AI Evaluation?","created":"2026-07-16","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2604.03244","title":"AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases","created":"2026-02-27","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2605.11209","title":"Measuring Five-Nines Reliability: Sample-Efficient LLM Evaluation in Saturated Benchmarks","created":"2026-05-11","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.07616","title":"Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling Estimation","created":"2026-05-29","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2601.00575","title":"InfoSynth: Information-Guided Benchmark Synthesis for LLMs","created":"2026-01-02","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.14307","title":"Benchmarking at the Edge of Comprehension","created":"2026-02-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.11205","title":"The Scaling Law of Evaluation Failure: Why Simple Averaging Collapses Under Data Sparsity and Item Difficulty Gaps, and How Item Response Theory Recovers Ground Truth Across Domains","created":"2026-05-11","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.01400","title":"Consistent and Distinctive: LLM Benchmark Efficiency via Maximum Independent Set Prompt Selection on Similarity Graphs","created":"2026-05-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.10154","title":"Quality Is Not a Safety Proxy Under Quantization","created":"2026-06-08","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.22295","title":"LLM Evaluation on Unseen Questions: Contextual Multidimensional IRT Model","created":"2026-08-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2510.06782","title":"GPT-5 Model Corrected GPT-4V's Chart Reading Errors, Not Prompting","created":"2025-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.12843","title":"Growing Pains: Extensible and Efficient LLM Benchmarking Via Fixed Parameter Calibration","created":"2026-04-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.24818","title":"Correcting test set contamination by spiking the training data","created":"2026-05-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.21937","title":"Latent Confidence Alignment for LLM Self-Assessment","created":"2026-06-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.05797","title":"Predicting Task Difficulty Without Rollouts","created":"2026-08-06","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.06262","title":"Hypothesis Testing with Conditional Queries: Learnability and the Value of Interaction","created":"2026-08-06","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.18280","title":"What Makes Software Issue Resolution Tasks Difficult for Agents?","created":"2026-08-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.35646","title":"Rubric Rewards from Item Response Theory","created":"2026-09-28","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.18248","title":"Are We Testing Too Much? A Survey of Benchmark Compression for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models","created":"2026-10-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}