{"total":100,"rows":[{"id":"2506.18096","title":"Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap","created":"2025-06-22","cited_by_count":128,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2508.16153","title":"Memento: Fine-tuning LLM Agents without Fine-tuning LLMs","created":"2025-08-22","cited_by_count":127,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2509.26603","title":"DeepScientist: Advancing Frontier-Pushing Scientific Findings Progressively","created":"2025-09-30","cited_by_count":63,"area":null},{"id":"2601.14525","title":"Towards Execution-Grounded Automated AI Research","created":"2026-01-20","cited_by_count":28,"area":null},{"id":"2505.07920","title":"Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussions","created":"2025-05-12","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2602.03828","title":"AutoFigure: Generating and Refining Publication-Ready Scientific Illustrations","created":"2026-02-03","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2506.01372","title":"AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability","created":"2025-06-02","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2509.09912","title":"When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review","created":"2025-09-12","cited_by_count":19,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2604.13940","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2511.16931","title":"OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists","created":"2025-11-21","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2509.04484","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors","created":"2025-08-31","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2509.10248","title":"Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM Generated Reviews of Scientific Publications","created":"2025-09-12","cited_by_count":13,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2505.23824","title":"Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluation","created":"2025-05-28","cited_by_count":12,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2508.10795","title":"Beyond \"Not Novel Enough\": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedback","created":"2025-08-14","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2509.19326","title":"Unveiling the Merits and Defects of LLMs in Automatic Review Generation for Scientific Papers","created":"2025-09-13","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2511.04583","title":"Jr. AI Scientist and Its Risk Report: Autonomous Scientific Exploration from a Baseline Paper","created":"2025-11-06","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11343","title":"From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2508.21422","title":"Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework","created":"2025-08-29","cited_by_count":11,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2509.13400","title":"Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews","created":"2025-09-16","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2603.14473","title":"AI Can Learn Scientific Taste","created":"2026-03-15","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2605.18661","title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2507.11810","title":"Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator","created":"2025-07-16","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2510.12367","title":"LLM-REVal: Can We Trust LLM Reviewers Yet?","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2507.21035","title":"GenoMAS: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Discovery via Code-Driven Gene Expression Analysis","created":"2025-07-28","cited_by_count":8,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2510.06579","title":"TinyScientist: An Interactive, Extensible, and Controllable Framework for Building Research Agents","created":"2025-10-08","cited_by_count":8,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2603.27146","title":"Learning to Predict Future-Aligned Research Proposals with Language Models","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2605.16616","title":"MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility","created":"2026-05-15","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2504.02902","title":"Beyond Accuracy: The Role of Calibration in Self-Improving Large Language Models","created":"2025-04-03","cited_by_count":7,"area":"synth"},{"id":"2505.11336","title":"XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI Collaboration","created":"2025-05-16","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2604.09590","title":"DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review","created":"2026-03-03","cited_by_count":7,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.11543","title":"NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-04-13","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2512.10449","title":"When Reject Turns into Accept: Quantifying the Vulnerability of LLM-Based Scientific Reviewers to Indirect Prompt Injection","created":"2025-12-11","cited_by_count":6,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2601.15715","title":"RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind","created":"2026-01-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2603.09723","title":"RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation","created":"2026-03-10","cited_by_count":6,"area":"alignment"},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2511.01287","title":"\"Give a Positive Review Only\": An Early Investigation Into In-Paper Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for AI Reviewers","created":"2025-11-03","cited_by_count":5,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2511.08317","title":"Automatic Paper Reviewing with Heterogeneous Graph Reasoning over LLM-Simulated Reviewer-Author Debates","created":"2025-11-11","cited_by_count":5,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.17745","title":"HiRAS: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Paper-to-Code Generation and Execution","created":"2026-04-20","cited_by_count":5,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2509.25179","title":"NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation","created":"2025-09-29","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.22638","title":"ScholarPeer: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-01-30","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27360","title":"Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2604.11924","title":"GoodPoint: Learning Constructive Scientific Paper Feedback from Author Responses","created":"2026-04-13","cited_by_count":4,"area":"alignment"},{"id":"2604.26506","title":"SafeReview: Defending LLM-based Review Systems Against Adversarial Hidden Prompts","created":"2026-04-29","cited_by_count":4,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2605.25415","title":"LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewers","created":"2026-05-25","cited_by_count":4,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2510.12194","title":"ResearStudio: A Human-Intervenable Framework for Building Controllable Deep-Research Agents","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2511.12485","title":"ARCHE: A Novel Task to Evaluate LLMs on Latent Reasoning Chain Extraction","created":"2025-11-16","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.11578","title":"Multi-Agent LLMs for Generating Research Limitations","created":"2025-12-30","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2601.19916","title":"PaperAudit-Bench: Benchmarking Error Detection in Research Papers for Critical Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-01-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.14261","title":"ReviewGrounder: Improving Review Substantiveness with Rubric-Guided, Tool-Integrated Agents","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22553","title":"Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-05-16","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2510.24636","title":"OpenReward: Learning to Reward Long-form Agentic Tasks via Reinforcement Learning","created":"2025-10-28","cited_by_count":2,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2511.10902","title":"Multimodal Peer Review Simulation with Actionable To-Do Recommendations for Community-Aware Manuscript Revisions","created":"2025-11-14","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2603.17588","title":"From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation","created":"2026-03-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.04074","title":"FactReview: Evidence-Grounded Peer Review with Execution-Based Claim Verification","created":"2026-04-05","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.24892","title":"ReviewGuard: Aligning LLM-Assisted Peer Review with Long-Term Scientific Impact","created":"2026-05-29","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2608.00005","title":"RubricReviewer: From Direct Critique to Objective and Comprehensive Rubric-Driven Peer Review","created":"2026-06-04","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2608.26701","title":"Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini in the Real-World","created":"2026-08-27","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2506.21763","title":"THE-Tree: Can Tracing Historical Evolution Enhance Scientific Verification and Reasoning?","created":"2025-06-26","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2507.00783","title":"Generative AI and the future of scientometrics: current topics and future questions","created":"2025-07-01","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.00733","title":"EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations","created":"2026-01-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.14285","title":"FMMD: A multimodal multidisciplinary dataset of open peer reviews from F1000Research","created":"2026-02-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.06862","title":"Supporting Artifact Evaluation with LLMs: A Study with Published Security Research Papers","created":"2026-03-06","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.20884","title":"MemoNoveltyAgent: A Historical Research Memory-Aware Agent Workflow for Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-03-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.22878","title":"SciAtlas: A Computable Atlas of Science for Knowledge-Grounded AI Research","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.28897","title":"Review Arcade: On the Human Alignment and Gameability of LLM Reviews","created":"2026-05-27","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.08857","title":"PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers on Overleaf","created":"2026-06-07","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.16322","title":"PaperJury: Due-Process Review for Bounded LaTeX Revision","created":"2026-06-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.25057","title":"LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges","created":"2026-06-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2606.30578","title":"Uncertainty-Aware Generation and Decision-Making Under Ambiguity","created":"2026-06-29","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.03659","title":"How Closely Do LLM Reviews Align with Human Peer Review?","created":"2026-08-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.12788","title":"ARAC: Benchmarking Auto-Research's Alignment and Completeness on End-to-End Researchs","created":"2026-08-13","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.30661","title":"SwarmBench: Can Large Language Models Act as Agent Swarm Orchestrators?","created":"2026-08-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.07713","title":"The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishing","created":"2026-09-07","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.22104","title":"DeepInstructor: An Agentic AI Instructor for Experience-Driven Idea Evaluation","created":"2026-08-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2512.24754","title":"AstroReview: An LLM-driven Multi-Agent Framework for Telescope Proposal Peer Review and Refinement","created":"2025-12-31","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.01128","title":"Paper Reconstruction Evaluation: Evaluating Presentation and Hallucination in AI-written Papers","created":"2026-04-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.27725","title":"AgentEconomist: An End-to-end Agentic System Translating Economic Intuitions into Executable Computational Experiments","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.21481","title":"AiraXiv: An AI-Driven Open-Access Platform for Human and AI Scientists","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27204","title":"GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-based Graph Evidence Expansion","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.19051","title":"Which Sections of a Research Paper Best Reveal Its Research Methods? Evidence from Library and Information Science","created":"2026-06-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.23233","title":"Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generation","created":"2026-06-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22681","title":"From peer review nuances to best practices","created":"2026-07-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.26670","title":"Scientific Knowledge Discovery in the Age of Large Language Models","created":"2026-07-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.10584","title":"HexEval: An Evidence-Driven Hexagonal Framework for Multidimensional Scholar Assessment","created":"2026-08-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14573","title":"WARA: Toward Automated Wireless Optimization Research with Closed-Loop LLM Agents","created":"2026-06-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2608.28612","title":"InternReviewer & InternAdvocate: Objective Reward and Evaluation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Peer Review and Rebuttal","created":"2026-07-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.03943","title":"More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R","created":"2026-09-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.05938","title":"SurveyAgent-HKA: A multi-agent framework for scientific survey generation with LLMs and human knowledge augmentation","created":"2026-09-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.05947","title":"Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-09-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.07673","title":"From Citations to Contributions: LLM-Assisted Credit Scoring of Research Articles","created":"2026-09-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.09076","title":"ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generation","created":"2026-09-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11234","title":"NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.13760","title":"Positioning manuscripts in the scientific landscape with agentic AI","created":"2026-09-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.16995","title":"PaperDoctor: Evidence-Grounded and Actionable Feedback for Scientific Papers in Progress","created":"2026-09-15","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.28041","title":"How Much Were You Told? Measuring External Information in Peer Reviews","created":"2026-09-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.39027","title":"A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.00531","title":"Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Papers","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}