{"total":62,"rows":[{"id":"2509.26603","title":"DeepScientist: Advancing Frontier-Pushing Scientific Findings Progressively","created":"2025-09-30","cited_by_count":63,"area":null},{"id":"2601.14525","title":"Towards Execution-Grounded Automated AI Research","created":"2026-01-20","cited_by_count":28,"area":null},{"id":"2505.07920","title":"Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussions","created":"2025-05-12","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2602.03828","title":"AutoFigure: Generating and Refining Publication-Ready Scientific Illustrations","created":"2026-02-03","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2506.01372","title":"AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability","created":"2025-06-02","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2604.13940","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2511.16931","title":"OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists","created":"2025-11-21","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2509.04484","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors","created":"2025-08-31","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2508.10795","title":"Beyond \"Not Novel Enough\": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedback","created":"2025-08-14","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2509.19326","title":"Unveiling the Merits and Defects of LLMs in Automatic Review Generation for Scientific Papers","created":"2025-09-13","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2511.04583","title":"Jr. AI Scientist and Its Risk Report: Autonomous Scientific Exploration from a Baseline Paper","created":"2025-11-06","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11343","title":"From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2509.13400","title":"Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews","created":"2025-09-16","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2603.14473","title":"AI Can Learn Scientific Taste","created":"2026-03-15","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2605.18661","title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2507.11810","title":"Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator","created":"2025-07-16","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2510.12367","title":"LLM-REVal: Can We Trust LLM Reviewers Yet?","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27146","title":"Learning to Predict Future-Aligned Research Proposals with Language Models","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2605.16616","title":"MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility","created":"2026-05-15","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2505.11336","title":"XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI Collaboration","created":"2025-05-16","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2604.11543","title":"NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-04-13","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15715","title":"RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind","created":"2026-01-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2509.25179","title":"NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation","created":"2025-09-29","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.22638","title":"ScholarPeer: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-01-30","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27360","title":"Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.19916","title":"PaperAudit-Bench: Benchmarking Error Detection in Research Papers for Critical Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-01-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22553","title":"Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-05-16","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2511.10902","title":"Multimodal Peer Review Simulation with Actionable To-Do Recommendations for Community-Aware Manuscript Revisions","created":"2025-11-14","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2603.17588","title":"From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation","created":"2026-03-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.04074","title":"FactReview: Evidence-Grounded Peer Review with Execution-Based Claim Verification","created":"2026-04-05","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.24892","title":"ReviewGuard: Aligning LLM-Assisted Peer Review with Long-Term Scientific Impact","created":"2026-05-29","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2608.00005","title":"RubricReviewer: From Direct Critique to Objective and Comprehensive Rubric-Driven Peer Review","created":"2026-06-04","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2608.26701","title":"Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini in the Real-World","created":"2026-08-27","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2507.00783","title":"Generative AI and the future of scientometrics: current topics and future questions","created":"2025-07-01","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.00733","title":"EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations","created":"2026-01-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.14285","title":"FMMD: A multimodal multidisciplinary dataset of open peer reviews from F1000Research","created":"2026-02-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.06862","title":"Supporting Artifact Evaluation with LLMs: A Study with Published Security Research Papers","created":"2026-03-06","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.22878","title":"SciAtlas: A Computable Atlas of Science for Knowledge-Grounded AI Research","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.28897","title":"Review Arcade: On the Human Alignment and Gameability of LLM Reviews","created":"2026-05-27","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.16322","title":"PaperJury: Due-Process Review for Bounded LaTeX Revision","created":"2026-06-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.30578","title":"Uncertainty-Aware Generation and Decision-Making Under Ambiguity","created":"2026-06-29","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.03659","title":"How Closely Do LLM Reviews Align with Human Peer Review?","created":"2026-08-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.12788","title":"ARAC: Benchmarking Auto-Research's Alignment and Completeness on End-to-End Researchs","created":"2026-08-13","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.21481","title":"AiraXiv: An AI-Driven Open-Access Platform for Human and AI Scientists","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27204","title":"GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-based Graph Evidence Expansion","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.19051","title":"Which Sections of a Research Paper Best Reveal Its Research Methods? Evidence from Library and Information Science","created":"2026-06-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.23233","title":"Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generation","created":"2026-06-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22681","title":"From peer review nuances to best practices","created":"2026-07-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.26670","title":"Scientific Knowledge Discovery in the Age of Large Language Models","created":"2026-07-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.10584","title":"HexEval: An Evidence-Driven Hexagonal Framework for Multidimensional Scholar Assessment","created":"2026-08-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.03943","title":"More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R","created":"2026-09-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.05947","title":"Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-09-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.07673","title":"From Citations to Contributions: LLM-Assisted Credit Scoring of Research Articles","created":"2026-09-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.09076","title":"ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generation","created":"2026-09-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11234","title":"NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.28041","title":"How Much Were You Told? Measuring External Information in Peer Reviews","created":"2026-09-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.39027","title":"A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.00531","title":"Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Papers","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}