{"total":61,"rows":[{"id":"2503.08569","title":"DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Process","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":100,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2509.14279","title":"Towards Robust Agentic CUDA Kernel Benchmarking, Verification, and Optimization","created":"2025-09-16","cited_by_count":56,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2503.08506","title":"ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":32,"area":null},{"id":"2506.07642","title":"TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Review","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":31,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11736","title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","created":"2025-02-17","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.19614","title":"Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review","created":"2025-02-26","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2505.11065","title":"Time Travel is Cheating: Going Live with DeepFund for Real-Time Fund Investment Benchmarking","created":"2025-05-16","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2511.16931","title":"OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists","created":"2025-11-21","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2605.03202","title":"Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation","created":"2026-05-04","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2505.23824","title":"Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluation","created":"2025-05-28","cited_by_count":12,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2511.04583","title":"Jr. AI Scientist and Its Risk Report: Autonomous Scientific Exploration from a Baseline Paper","created":"2025-11-06","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2505.11718","title":"REMOR: Automated Peer Review Generation with LLM Reasoning and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning","created":"2025-05-16","cited_by_count":11,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2506.11343","title":"From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2509.13400","title":"Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews","created":"2025-09-16","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2605.18661","title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2508.14146","title":"MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation","created":"2025-08-19","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2605.23204","title":"AutoResearch AI: Towards AI-Powered Research Automation for Scientific Discovery","created":"2026-05-22","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2507.11810","title":"Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator","created":"2025-07-16","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2601.01576","title":"OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-01-04","cited_by_count":8,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.11543","title":"NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-04-13","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2512.22145","title":"Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models","created":"2025-12-14","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2602.18458","title":"The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research","created":"2026-02-05","cited_by_count":6,"area":"mechinterp"},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2511.01287","title":"\"Give a Positive Review Only\": An Early Investigation Into In-Paper Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for AI Reviewers","created":"2025-11-03","cited_by_count":5,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2512.05925","title":"To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysis","created":"2025-12-05","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2601.18081","title":"DRPG (Decompose, Retrieve, Plan, Generate): An Agentic Framework for Academic Rebuttal","created":"2026-01-26","cited_by_count":5,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2601.22638","title":"ScholarPeer: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-01-30","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22553","title":"Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-05-16","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.04074","title":"FactReview: Evidence-Grounded Peer Review with Execution-Based Claim Verification","created":"2026-04-05","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2601.20704","title":"Structurally Human, Semantically Biased: Detecting LLM-Generated References with Embeddings and GNNs","created":"2026-01-28","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.00733","title":"EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations","created":"2026-01-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.14285","title":"FMMD: A multimodal multidisciplinary dataset of open peer reviews from F1000Research","created":"2026-02-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.18453","title":"LLM-Assisted Replication for Quantitative Social Science","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.20884","title":"MemoNoveltyAgent: A Historical Research Memory-Aware Agent Workflow for Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-03-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.14162","title":"Decoupling Scores and Text: The Politeness Principle in Peer Review","created":"2026-03-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19578","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.02651","title":"ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review","created":"2026-05-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.06025","title":"EGTR-Review: Efficient Evidence-Grounded Scientific Peer Review Generation via Multi-Agent Teacher Distillation","created":"2026-06-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.08857","title":"PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers on Overleaf","created":"2026-06-07","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.12716","title":"Does AI Reviewer See the Full Picture? Attacking and Defending Multimodal Peer Review","created":"2026-06-10","cited_by_count":1,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2606.25057","title":"LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges","created":"2026-06-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2608.03581","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality","created":"2026-08-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2609.07713","title":"The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishing","created":"2026-09-07","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2509.00277","title":"SABER: A SQL-Compatible Semantic Document Processing System Based on Extended Relational Algebra","created":"2025-08-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2510.02027","title":"Zero-shot reasoning for simulating scholarly peer-review","created":"2025-10-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2511.02720","title":"LLEXICORP: End-user Explainability of Convolutional Neural Networks","created":"2025-11-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2511.21755","title":"Who Owns the Knowledge? Copyright, GenAI, and the Future of Academic Publishing","created":"2025-11-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2512.10895","title":"LLMs Can Assist with Proposal Selection at Large User Facilities","created":"2025-12-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.13792","title":"StackingNet: Collective Inference Across Independent AI Foundation Models","created":"2026-02-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.20214","title":"Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge","created":"2026-03-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.01128","title":"Paper Reconstruction Evaluation: Evaluating Presentation and Hallucination in AI-written Papers","created":"2026-04-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.07964","title":"Are we still able to recognize pearls? Machine-driven peer review and the risk to creativity: An explainable RAG-XAI detection framework with markers extraction","created":"2026-04-09","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27204","title":"GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-based Graph Evidence Expansion","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.23233","title":"Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generation","created":"2026-06-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.28612","title":"InternReviewer & InternAdvocate: Objective Reward and Evaluation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Peer Review and Rebuttal","created":"2026-07-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2608.28626","title":"Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects","created":"2026-07-31","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.16995","title":"PaperDoctor: Evidence-Grounded and Actionable Feedback for Scientific Papers in Progress","created":"2026-09-15","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2610.16814","title":"StableJudge: A Lightweight Adversarial Defense Framework for LLM-as-a-Judge","created":"2026-10-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}