{"total":46,"rows":[{"id":"2601.16669","title":"PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice","created":"2026-01-23","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2506.08354","title":"Position: Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaning","created":"2025-06-10","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2508.00709","title":"NyayaRAG: Realistic Legal Judgment Prediction with RAG under the Indian Common Law System","created":"2025-08-01","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2510.01474","title":"AIReg-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models That Assess AI Regulation Compliance","created":"2025-10-01","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2510.19365","title":"The Massive Legal Embedding Benchmark (MLEB)","created":"2025-10-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2510.20941","title":"Do LLMs Truly Understand When a Precedent Is Overruled?","created":"2025-10-23","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2505.12837","title":"The Hidden Structure -- Improving Legal Document Understanding Through Explicit Text Formatting","created":"2025-05-19","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2508.16357","title":"MizanQA: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Moroccan Legal Question Answering","created":"2025-08-22","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2509.00285","title":"OpinioRAG: Towards Generating User-Centric Opinion Highlights from Large-scale Online Reviews","created":"2025-08-30","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2503.04305","title":"Computational Law: Datasets, Benchmarks, and Ontologies","created":"2025-03-06","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2503.08379","title":"JurisTCU: A Brazilian Portuguese Information Retrieval Dataset with Query Relevance Judgments","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2507.01259","title":"GAIus: Combining Genai with Legal Clauses Retrieval for Knowledge-based Assistant","created":"2025-07-02","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.23585","title":"ComplianceNLP: Knowledge-Graph-Augmented RAG for Multi-Framework Regulatory Gap Detection","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.09389","title":"LexRubric: A Rubric-Guided Diagnostic Benchmark for Open-Ended Legal Tasks","created":"2026-06-08","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2409.13732","title":"Enhancing Large Language Models with Domain-Specific Knowledge: The Case in Topological Materials","created":"2024-09-10","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2412.06272","title":"Evaluating LLM-based Approaches to Legal Citation Prediction: Domain-specific Pre-training, Fine-tuning, or RAG? A Benchmark and an Australian Law Case Study","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2504.04131","title":"Precise Legal Sentence Boundary Detection for Retrieval at Scale: NUPunkt and CharBoundary","created":"2025-04-05","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2506.00608","title":"PAKTON: A Multi-Agent Framework for Question Answering in Long Legal Agreements","created":"2025-05-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.01331","title":"AppellateGen: A Benchmark for Appellate Legal Judgment Generation","created":"2026-01-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.04718","title":"AI-Assisted Moot Courts: Simulating Justice-Specific Questioning in Oral Arguments","created":"2026-03-05","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.18752","title":"GreekBarRetrieval: A Benchmark for Greek Statutory Retrieval","created":"2026-08-19","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.20220","title":"InsufficiencyBench: Evaluating LLM legal advice on underspecified user queries","created":"2026-08-20","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.21036","title":"Evaluating Large Language Model Performance on International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code Compliance","created":"2026-08-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2509.06356","title":"PL-CA: A Parametric Legal Case Augmentation Framework","created":"2025-09-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2512.13654","title":"Large-Language Memorization During the Classification of United States Supreme Court Cases","created":"2025-12-15","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.22292","title":"ReLeVAnT: Relevance Lexical Vectors for Accurate Legal Text Classification","created":"2026-04-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.01486","title":"MAP-Law: Coverage-Driven Retrieval Control for Multi-Turn Legal Consultation","created":"2026-05-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.24266","title":"An Interactive Paradigm for Deep Research","created":"2026-05-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27331","title":"Maat: The Agentic Legal Research Assistant for Competition Protection","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.13931","title":"DLawBench: Evaluating LLMs Through Multi-Turn Legal Consultation","created":"2026-06-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.20506","title":"Optimizing Hypergraph-Based RAG: Toward Better Fact Extraction and Chunk Retrieval","created":"2026-07-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.23446","title":"Do Small Models Use the Law You Give Them? Context-Injected Fine-Tuning for Legal QA in Bangladesh","created":"2026-07-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.24449","title":"Evaluating RAG for French immigration law: a benchmark and baseline study","created":"2026-07-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.03756","title":"LegalPincite: Multi-level Legal Information Retrieval Dataset","created":"2026-08-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.11584","title":"EnterpriseRAG: Benchmarking LLM Instruction Adherence and Robustness under Non-Ideal Enterprise Retrieval","created":"2026-08-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14210","title":"How Much Do Legal RAG Systems Still Hallucinate?","created":"2026-08-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.21409","title":"Sycophants in the Courtroom: Are LLMs Fragile to Juridical Authority and Evolving Legal Standards?","created":"2026-08-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.30327","title":"Do Small Models Use the Law You Give Them? Measuring Context Use on a Bilingual Bangladesh Legal Benchmark","created":"2026-08-31","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.30929","title":"Annotated Surrogate Retrieval for Polish Statutory Law","created":"2026-08-31","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.10293","title":"GANDR: Claim Auditing for Verifiable Legal Answer Generation","created":"2026-09-09","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.22127","title":"Beyond Accuracy and Surface Fluency: Risk-Sensitive Evaluation of LLMs for Legal Clause Generation","created":"2026-08-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.27014","title":"ContraVis: Evidence-Grounded Visual Analytics for Contradiction Review in Legal Contracts","created":"2026-09-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.27354","title":"Constraint-Driven Context Engineering: Designing Domain Interfaces for AI Systems","created":"2026-09-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.08894","title":"Trustworthy Domain-Specific AI for Structured Knowledge Retrieval and Reasoning","created":"2026-10-06","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.11136","title":"The \"10th Juror\": Open-Set Standpoint Screening for Bureaucratic Bias Detection","created":"2026-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.14465","title":"Co-adaptive Rule Routing and Constraining for Structured Knowledge Retrieval","created":"2026-10-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}