{"total":34,"rows":[{"id":"2502.06559","title":"Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluation","created":"2025-02-10","cited_by_count":60,"area":null},{"id":"2506.20702","title":"The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities","created":"2025-06-25","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2509.00591","title":"Probe-Rewrite-Evaluate: A Workflow for Reliable Benchmarks and Quantifying Evaluation Awareness","created":"2025-08-30","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2506.06414","title":"Benchmarking Misuse Mitigation Against Covert Adversaries","created":"2025-06-06","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2510.08211","title":"LLMs Deceive Unintentionally: Emergent Misalignment in Dishonesty from Misaligned Samples to Biased Human-AI Interactions","created":"2025-10-09","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2604.16403","title":"Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technology","created":"2026-03-31","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2412.15035","title":"LLMs Lost in Translation: M-ALERT uncovers Cross-Linguistic Safety Inconsistencies","created":"2024-12-19","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2503.05628","title":"Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version","created":"2025-03-07","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2508.05464","title":"Bench-2-CoP: Can We Trust Benchmarking for EU AI Compliance?","created":"2025-08-07","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2506.10378","title":"Discovering Hierarchical Latent Capabilities of Language Models via Causal Representation Learning","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2507.06277","title":"The Prompt War: How AI Decides on a Military Intervention","created":"2025-07-08","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2509.16332","title":"Psychometric Personality Shaping Modulates Capabilities and Safety in Language Models","created":"2025-09-19","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2606.09809","title":"Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting","created":"2026-06-08","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2502.15873","title":"Practical Principles for AI Cost and Compute Accounting","created":"2025-02-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2502.18339","title":"Correlating and Predicting Human Evaluations of Language Models from Natural Language Processing Benchmarks","created":"2025-02-24","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2603.26676","title":"Evaluating Human-AI Safety: A Framework for Measuring Harmful Capability Uplift","created":"2026-03-06","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2605.04135","title":"Frontier Lag: A Bibliometric Audit of Capability Misrepresentation in Academic AI Evaluation","created":"2026-05-05","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2410.23472","title":"Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems","created":"2024-10-30","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2504.14039","title":"MEQA: A Meta-Evaluation Framework for Question & Answer LLM Benchmarks","created":"2025-04-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2510.13852","title":"ConsistencyAI: A Benchmark to Assess LLMs' Factual Consistency When Responding to Different Demographic Groups","created":"2025-10-11","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2512.10058","title":"Mind the Gap! Pathways Towards Unifying AI Safety and Ethics Research","created":"2025-12-10","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.06233","title":"Blind Refusal: Language Models Refuse to Help Users Evade Unjust, Absurd, and Illegitimate Rules","created":"2026-04-03","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2412.15433","title":"Quantifying detection rates for dangerous capabilities: a theoretical model of dangerous capability evaluations","created":"2024-12-19","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2508.06111","title":"SKATE, a Scalable Tournament Eval: Weaker LLMs differentiate between stronger ones using verifiable challenges","created":"2025-08-08","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.20813","title":"Pressure Reveals Character: Behavioural Alignment Evaluation at Depth","created":"2026-02-24","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.10154","title":"Quality Is Not a Safety Proxy Under Quantization","created":"2026-06-08","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.17183","title":"Benchmarking the Benchmarks: Evaluating Automated Safety Benchmarks for Small Language Models","created":"2026-08-17","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2507.06434","title":"Deprecating Benchmarks: Criteria and Framework","created":"2025-07-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.05175","title":"Incentive Aware AI Regulations: A Credal Characterisation","created":"2026-03-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.12500","title":"Safety Training Modulates Harmful Misalignment Under On-Policy RL, But Direction Depends on Environment Design","created":"2026-04-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.05407","title":"Position: Preventing AI-Generated CSAM Necessitates New Approaches to AI Safety","created":"2026-06-09","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.09306","title":"Exposure is not manifestation: measurement target and output resolution jointly determine which behavioural-faithfulness evaluator wins","created":"2026-07-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.18086","title":"Position: Current Model Cards Are Insufficient for Downstream Governance of Open-Weight Foundation Models","created":"2026-06-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.10232","title":"LLM Persuasion Is in the Eye of the Evaluation","created":"2026-10-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}