{"total":21,"rows":[{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61,"area":null},{"id":"2505.07920","title":"Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussions","created":"2025-05-12","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2604.13940","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2511.16931","title":"OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists","created":"2025-11-21","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2509.19326","title":"Unveiling the Merits and Defects of LLMs in Automatic Review Generation for Scientific Papers","created":"2025-09-13","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2506.08134","title":"Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2512.22145","title":"Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models","created":"2025-12-14","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2503.22444","title":"Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists","created":"2025-03-28","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2508.11779","title":"A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs' Processing of Academic Text Input","created":"2025-08-15","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2509.25179","title":"NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation","created":"2025-09-29","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2510.16549","title":"ReviewGuard: Enhancing Deficient Peer Review Detection via LLM-Driven Data Augmentation","created":"2025-10-18","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2511.05120","title":"A Toolbox for Improving Evolutionary Prompt Search","created":"2025-11-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.23593","title":"When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2504.14620","title":"A Hierarchical Framework for Measuring Scientific Paper Innovation via Large Language Models","created":"2025-04-20","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.14285","title":"FMMD: A multimodal multidisciplinary dataset of open peer reviews from F1000Research","created":"2026-02-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19578","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22681","title":"From peer review nuances to best practices","created":"2026-07-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.03943","title":"More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R","created":"2026-09-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.28041","title":"How Much Were You Told? Measuring External Information in Peer Reviews","created":"2026-09-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.37097","title":"Breaking the Illusion of Review Reliability under Static Evaluation: SCOPE Fuzzing for LLM-based Scientific Reviewers","created":"2026-09-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}