{"total":17,"rows":[{"id":"2506.10922","title":"Robustly Improving LLM Fairness in Realistic Settings via Interpretability","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2410.16498","title":"Natural Language Processing for Human Resources: A Survey","created":"2024-10-21","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2507.02087","title":"Evaluating the Promise and Pitfalls of LLMs in Hiring Decisions","created":"2025-07-02","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2506.14092","title":"Fragile Preferences: A Deep Dive Into Order Effects in Large Language Models","created":"2025-06-17","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2503.06792","title":"On the Mutual Influence of Gender and Occupation in LLM Representations","created":"2025-03-09","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2411.17338","title":"Different Bias Under Different Criteria: Assessing Bias in LLMs with a Fact-Based Approach","created":"2024-11-26","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2507.02595","title":"MPF: Aligning and Debiasing Language Models post Deployment via Multi Perspective Fusion","created":"2025-07-03","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.02776","title":"Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answers","created":"2026-06-01","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.12337","title":"Identifying and Mitigating Gender Cues in Academic Recommendation Letters: An Interpretability Case Study","created":"2026-04-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.06861","title":"BiasLab: A Multilingual Dual-Framing Framework for LLM Bias Measurement, Applied to Workplace and HR Contexts","created":"2026-01-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.18122","title":"Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents","created":"2026-04-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.30804","title":"Anchoring LLM Gender Bias to Human Baselines: A Cross-Lingual Audit","created":"2026-05-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.10089","title":"Status Association Does Not Reliably Predict Decision Leakage","created":"2026-08-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.21206","title":"No PUN Intended: Plausible Unknown Names for Person-Centred LLM Evaluation","created":"2026-08-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.00519","title":"The Safeguard Worked. Is the LLM System Safer?","created":"2026-09-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.04127","title":"Epistemic Warrant for LLM Recommendations: Characterizing the Basis for Reliance When Ground Truth Is Unavailable","created":"2026-09-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.22169","title":"Monocultural Biases: Correlated biases in large language models lead to unequal systemic exclusion rates in hiring","created":"2026-08-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}