{"list":"other","total":80,"rows":[{"id":"1610.07524","title":"Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments","created":"2016-10-24","cited_by_count":672},{"id":"1609.05807","title":"Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores","created":"2016-09-19","cited_by_count":586},{"id":"2004.14974","title":"Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims","created":"2020-04-30","cited_by_count":554},{"id":"2004.07180","title":"SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers","created":"2020-04-15","cited_by_count":430},{"id":"2308.13418","title":"Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documents","created":"2023-08-25","cited_by_count":245},{"id":"2310.01783","title":"Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis","created":"2023-10-03","cited_by_count":200},{"id":"2305.14259","title":"SciMON: Scientific Inspiration Machines Optimized for Novelty","created":"2023-05-23","cited_by_count":179},{"id":"1909.03004","title":"Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Results","created":"2019-09-06","cited_by_count":169},{"id":"1912.11078","title":"Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overview","created":"2019-11-09","cited_by_count":137},{"id":"1804.09635","title":"A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applications","created":"2018-04-25","cited_by_count":136},{"id":"2004.15011","title":"TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documents","created":"2020-04-30","cited_by_count":136},{"id":"2306.00622","title":"ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":122},{"id":"2401.04259","title":"MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers","created":"2024-01-08","cited_by_count":104},{"id":"2210.13777","title":"SciFact-Open: Towards open-domain scientific claim verification","created":"2022-10-25","cited_by_count":94},{"id":"2310.00367","title":"AutomaTikZ: Text-Guided Synthesis of Scientific Vector Graphics with TikZ","created":"2023-09-30","cited_by_count":79},{"id":"2101.11796","title":"DOC2PPT: Automatic Presentation Slides Generation from Scientific Documents","created":"2021-01-28","cited_by_count":70},{"id":"2211.06651","title":"NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review","created":"2022-11-12","cited_by_count":60},{"id":"2203.03802","title":"Understanding Iterative Revision from Human-Written Text","created":"2022-03-08","cited_by_count":57},{"id":"2109.06598","title":"Just What do You Think You're Doing, Dave?' A Checklist for Responsible Data Use in NLP","created":"2021-09-14","cited_by_count":47},{"id":"1802.08301","title":"Content-Based Citation Recommendation","created":"2018-02-22","cited_by_count":43},{"id":"2305.14889","title":"Evaluating Evaluation Metrics: A Framework for Analyzing NLG Evaluation Metrics using Measurement Theory","created":"2023-05-24","cited_by_count":43},{"id":"2110.07474","title":"MReD: A Meta-Review Dataset for Structure-Controllable Text Generation","created":"2021-10-14","cited_by_count":42},{"id":"1903.10104","title":"Argument Mining for Understanding Peer Reviews","created":"2019-03-25","cited_by_count":41},{"id":"2307.05492","title":"GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study","created":"2023-06-16","cited_by_count":40},{"id":"2006.16437","title":"Mitigating Manipulation in Peer Review via Randomized Reviewer Assignments","created":"2020-06-29","cited_by_count":38},{"id":"2104.00640","title":"AmbiFC: Fact-Checking Ambiguous Claims with Evidence","created":"2021-04-01","cited_by_count":38},{"id":"2204.10805","title":"Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review","created":"2022-04-22","cited_by_count":37},{"id":"2002.06961","title":"Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets","created":"2020-02-17","cited_by_count":36},{"id":"2110.08520","title":"DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions","created":"2021-10-16","cited_by_count":36},{"id":"2306.12587","title":"ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews","created":"2023-06-21","cited_by_count":34},{"id":"1708.09794","title":"Design and Analysis of the NIPS 2016 Review Process","created":"2017-08-31","cited_by_count":33},{"id":"2010.03863","title":"What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?","created":"2020-10-08","cited_by_count":32},{"id":"1903.11367","title":"Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference","created":"2019-03-27","cited_by_count":31},{"id":"1806.06237","title":"PeerReview4All: Fair and Accurate Reviewer Assignment in Peer Review","created":"2018-06-16","cited_by_count":30},{"id":"1905.11924","title":"Paper Matching with Local Fairness Constraints","created":"2019-05-28","cited_by_count":30},{"id":"2107.00414","title":"MultiCite: Modeling realistic citations requires moving beyond the single-sentence single-label setting","created":"2021-07-01","cited_by_count":30},{"id":"1806.05085","title":"Your 2 is My 1, Your 3 is My 9: Handling Arbitrary Miscalibrations in Ratings","created":"2018-06-13","cited_by_count":28},{"id":"2205.04561","title":"Scim: Intelligent Skimming Support for Scientific Papers","created":"2022-05-09","cited_by_count":27},{"id":"2305.01498","title":"Summarizing Multiple Documents with Conversational Structure for Meta-Review Generation","created":"2023-05-02","cited_by_count":27},{"id":"2311.09497","title":"Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments","created":"2023-11-16","cited_by_count":27},{"id":"2210.15067","title":"arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific Writing","created":"2022-10-26","cited_by_count":26},{"id":"1909.13872","title":"Simple and Effective Paraphrastic Similarity from Parallel Translations","created":"2019-09-30","cited_by_count":25},{"id":"2006.03257","title":"Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis of Scientific Reviews","created":"2020-06-05","cited_by_count":24},{"id":"1909.02063","title":"The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science","created":"2019-09-04","cited_by_count":21},{"id":"2205.11484","title":"Towards Automated Document Revision: Grammatical Error Correction, Fluency Edits, and Beyond","created":"2022-05-23","cited_by_count":20},{"id":"2311.11967","title":"Automatic Analysis of Substantiation in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2023-11-20","cited_by_count":19},{"id":"2202.12273","title":"Matching Papers and Reviewers at Large Conferences","created":"2022-02-24","cited_by_count":18},{"id":"2311.03998","title":"Exploring Jiu-Jitsu Argumentation for Writing Peer Review Rebuttals","created":"2023-11-07","cited_by_count":18},{"id":"2011.15050","title":"A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers in Large Conferences","created":"2020-11-30","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"2402.15589","title":"LLMs as Meta-Reviewers' Assistants: A Case Study","created":"2024-02-23","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"2205.06207","title":"CiteSum: Citation Text-guided Scientific Extreme Summarization and Domain Adaptation with Limited Supervision","created":"2022-05-12","cited_by_count":15},{"id":"2010.04041","title":"Catch Me if I Can: Detecting Strategic Behaviour in Peer Assessment","created":"2020-10-08","cited_by_count":14},{"id":"2305.14647","title":"Scientific Opinion Summarization: Paper Meta-review Generation Dataset, Methods, and Evaluation","created":"2023-05-24","cited_by_count":14},{"id":"2201.11443","title":"Yes-Yes-Yes: Proactive Data Collection for ACL Rolling Review and Beyond","created":"2022-01-27","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2208.08140","title":"Differential Privacy in Natural Language Processing: The Story So Far","created":"2022-08-17","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2402.03530","title":"ReviewFlow: Intelligent Scaffolding to Support Academic Peer Reviewing","created":"2024-02-05","cited_by_count":12},{"id":"2010.15300","title":"Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review","created":"2020-10-29","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2303.16750","title":"A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem","created":"2023-03-23","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2305.17339","title":"Counterfactual Evaluation of Peer-Review Assignment Policies","created":"2023-05-27","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"1808.09057","title":"Loss Functions, Axioms, and Peer Review","created":"2018-08-27","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2002.04689","title":"Two Huge Title and Keyword Generation Corpora of Research Articles","created":"2020-02-11","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2007.07079","title":"A SUPER* Algorithm to Optimize Paper Bidding in Peer Review","created":"2020-06-27","cited_by_count":10},{"id":"2012.00714","title":"Debiasing Evaluations That are Biased by Evaluations","created":"2020-12-01","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2108.02126","title":"I Will Have Order! Optimizing Orders for Fair Reviewer Assignment","created":"2021-08-04","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2207.02303","title":"A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review","created":"2022-06-24","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2309.12356","title":"A Critical Examination of the Ethics of AI-Mediated Peer Review","created":"2023-09-02","cited_by_count":8},{"id":"2302.12611","title":"CARE: Collaborative AI-Assisted Reading Environment","created":"2023-02-24","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2402.07860","title":"On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding","created":"2024-02-12","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"2011.15083","title":"A Large Scale Randomized Controlled Trial on Herding in Peer-Review Discussions","created":"2020-11-30","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2212.08353","title":"How to disagree well: Investigating the dispute tactics used on Wikipedia","created":"2022-12-16","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2403.01015","title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions","created":"2024-03-01","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2205.01005","title":"What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review","created":"2022-05-02","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2207.11315","title":"Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment","created":"2022-07-22","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"2301.00221","title":"The Role of Author Identities in Peer Review","created":"2022-12-31","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"2302.08450","title":"Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matching","created":"2023-02-16","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"2201.11308","title":"Calibration with Privacy in Peer Review","created":"2022-01-27","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2203.17259","title":"To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online","created":"2022-03-31","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2006.16385","title":"On the Privacy-Utility Tradeoff in Peer-Review Data Analysis","created":"2020-06-29","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2211.12686","title":"Batching of Tasks by Users of Pseudonymous Forums: Anonymity Compromise and Protection","created":"2022-11-23","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"2307.05443","title":"Testing for Reviewer Anchoring in Peer Review: A Randomized Controlled Trial","created":"2023-07-11","cited_by_count":1}],"next_cursor":null}