{"total":56,"rows":[{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61,"area":null},{"id":"2412.01708","title":"Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review","created":"2024-12-02","cited_by_count":53,"area":null},{"id":"2411.05025","title":"LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers' Usage and Perceptions","created":"2024-10-30","cited_by_count":47,"area":null},{"id":"2408.10365","title":"AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews","created":"2024-08-19","cited_by_count":44,"area":null},{"id":"2506.02314","title":"ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code","created":"2025-06-02","cited_by_count":36,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11736","title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","created":"2025-02-17","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.17086","title":"Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews","created":"2025-02-24","cited_by_count":24,"area":null},{"id":"2410.08044","title":"The Rise of AI-Generated Content in Wikipedia","created":"2024-10-10","cited_by_count":22,"area":null},{"id":"2502.19614","title":"Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review","created":"2025-02-26","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2604.13940","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2409.13686","title":"The Impact of Large Language Models in Academia: from Writing to Speaking","created":"2024-09-20","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2510.11408","title":"Valid Survey Simulations with Limited Human Data: The Roles of Prompting, Fine-Tuning, and Rectification","created":"2025-10-13","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2411.03417","title":"Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment","created":"2024-11-05","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2510.08867","title":"ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review","created":"2025-10-09","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2605.03202","title":"Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation","created":"2026-05-04","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2504.13959","title":"AI Safety Should Prioritize the Future of Work","created":"2025-04-16","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2509.13400","title":"Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews","created":"2025-09-16","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2602.13042","title":"GPTZero: Robust Detection of LLM-Generated Texts","created":"2026-02-13","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2605.18661","title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2601.06586","title":"Detecting LLM-Generated Text with Performance Guarantees","created":"2026-01-10","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2507.11810","title":"Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator","created":"2025-07-16","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2410.07302","title":"Examining the Prevalence and Dynamics of AI-Generated Media in Art Subreddits","created":"2024-10-09","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2505.16477","title":"Advancing the Scientific Method with Large Language Models: From Hypothesis to Discovery","created":"2025-05-22","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2507.17216","title":"The Pluralistic Moral Gap: Understanding Judgment and Value Differences between Humans and Large Language Models","created":"2025-07-23","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2510.21900","title":"Deep Literature Survey Automation with an Iterative Workflow","created":"2025-10-24","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11193","title":"Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review","created":"2025-02-16","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2407.12220","title":"Questionable practices in machine learning","created":"2024-07-17","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2505.21636","title":"The Feasibility of Topic-Based Watermarking on Academic Peer Reviews","created":"2025-05-27","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2510.21192","title":"Gen-Review: A Large-scale Dataset of AI-Generated (and Human-written) Peer Reviews","created":"2025-10-24","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.17036","title":"LLM-Generated or Human-Written? Comparing Review and Non-Review Papers on ArXiv","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2605.21713","title":"Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-Reviews","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2606.10159","title":"Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Community","created":"2026-06-08","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2606.20897","title":"PeerCheck: Enhancing LLM-Generated Academic Reviews Towards Human-Level Quality","created":"2026-06-18","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2504.02899","title":"Meat-Free Day Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions but Poses Challenges for Customer Retention and Adherence to Dietary Guidelines","created":"2025-04-02","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2505.17327","title":"GPT Editors, Not Authors: The Stylistic Footprint of LLMs in Academic Preprints","created":"2025-05-22","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2603.17588","title":"From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation","created":"2026-03-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19998","title":"What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19578","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.25860","title":"Luminol-AIDetect: Fast Zero-shot Machine-Generated Text Detection based on Perplexity under Text Shuffling","created":"2026-04-28","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.00087","title":"DeGenTWeb: A First Look at LLM-dominant Websites","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.06903","title":"MELD: Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector for AI-Generated Text","created":"2026-05-07","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.03581","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality","created":"2026-08-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.20214","title":"Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge","created":"2026-03-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.07964","title":"Are we still able to recognize pearls? Machine-driven peer review and the risk to creativity: An explainable RAG-XAI detection framework with markers extraction","created":"2026-04-09","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27204","title":"GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-based Graph Evidence Expansion","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.15887","title":"Intelligence Is Not the Bottleneck: Validating an LLM First-Pass Manuscript Score Against Peer-Review Outcomes","created":"2026-06-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.22166","title":"Rebuttals Move Peer-Review Scores, but Initial-Review Structure Bounds the Movement","created":"2026-06-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14625","title":"Local AI pre-screening for human triple-blind peer review in health sciences","created":"2026-07-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.03580","title":"HalluPeer: A Taxonomy-driven Benchmark for Detecting Hallucinations in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2026-09-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.05947","title":"Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-09-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11983","title":"Who Pays for Open Review? Visible Author Reputation and Its Effect on Ratings","created":"2026-09-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.23264","title":"Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics","created":"2026-09-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.38427","title":"Policy-Conditioned AI-Use Detection: An Evidentiary Framework for Academic Publishing","created":"2026-09-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.11087","title":"Beyond Imitation: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.11355","title":"Defensive Writing in GPT Models","created":"2026-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}