{"total":22,"rows":[{"id":"2502.14425","title":"A Survey on Data Contamination for Large Language Models","created":"2025-02-20","cited_by_count":35,"area":null},{"id":"2405.16281","title":"ConStat: Performance-Based Contamination Detection in Large Language Models","created":"2024-05-25","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2406.14644","title":"Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediation","created":"2024-06-20","cited_by_count":30,"area":null},{"id":"2406.17681","title":"VarBench: Robust Language Model Benchmarking Through Dynamic Variable Perturbation","created":"2024-06-25","cited_by_count":29,"area":null},{"id":"2410.18966","title":"Does Data Contamination Detection Work (Well) for LLMs? A Survey and Evaluation on Detection Assumptions","created":"2024-10-24","cited_by_count":26,"area":null},{"id":"2503.17514","title":"Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained On","created":"2025-03-21","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2409.16118","title":"TabEBM: A Tabular Data Augmentation Method with Distinct Class-Specific Energy-Based Models","created":"2024-09-24","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2503.16402","title":"The Emperor's New Clothes in Benchmarking? A Rigorous Examination of Mitigation Strategies for LLM Benchmark Data Contamination","created":"2025-03-20","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2506.21614","title":"LastingBench: Defend Benchmarks Against Knowledge Leakage","created":"2025-06-21","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2412.10424","title":"LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluation","created":"2024-12-10","cited_by_count":13,"area":null},{"id":"2404.00699","title":"A Comprehensive Survey of Contamination Detection Methods in Large Language Models","created":"2024-03-31","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2411.04257","title":"LSHBloom: Memory-efficient, Extreme-scale Document Deduplication","created":"2024-11-06","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2409.00696","title":"Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation","created":"2024-09-01","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2506.04142","title":"Establishing Trustworthy LLM Evaluation via Shortcut Neuron Analysis","created":"2025-06-04","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2511.18889","title":"CoreEval: Automatically Building Contamination-Resilient Datasets with Real-World Knowledge toward Reliable LLM Evaluation","created":"2025-11-24","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2508.05452","title":"LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models","created":"2025-08-07","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2510.08569","title":"ArenaBencher: Automatic Benchmark Evolution via Multi-Model Competitive Evaluation","created":"2025-10-09","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2410.15005","title":"CAP: Data Contamination Detection via Consistency Amplification","created":"2024-10-19","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2501.13983","title":"AdEval: Alignment-based Dynamic Evaluation to Mitigate Data Contamination in Large Language Models","created":"2025-01-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.24079","title":"TRACER: A Semantic-Aware Framework for Fine-Grained Contamination Detection in Code LLMs","created":"2026-05-22","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.07914","title":"When Is Benchmark Contamination Detectable? Information Limits and Power-Calibrated Audits","created":"2026-08-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.22183","title":"CleanScore: Black-Box Benchmark Audits with Negative Controls and Sensitivity Bounds","created":"2026-08-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}