{"total":24,"rows":[{"id":"2408.10365","title":"AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews","created":"2024-08-19","cited_by_count":44,"area":null},{"id":"2505.04966","title":"Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards","created":"2025-05-08","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2411.07127","title":"Benchmarking LLMs' Judgments with No Gold Standard","created":"2024-11-11","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2604.13940","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2402.15589","title":"LLMs as Meta-Reviewers' Assistants: A Case Study","created":"2024-02-23","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2411.03417","title":"Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment","created":"2024-11-05","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2509.04484","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors","created":"2025-08-31","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2511.21843","title":"FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers","created":"2025-11-26","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2506.08134","title":"Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2408.13430","title":"The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review","created":"2024-08-24","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2504.06910","title":"Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews","created":"2025-04-09","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.04350","title":"RIGOURATE: Quantifying Scientific Exaggeration with Evidence-Aligned Claim Evaluation","created":"2026-01-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2606.20897","title":"PeerCheck: Enhancing LLM-Generated Academic Reviews Towards Human-Level Quality","created":"2026-06-18","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2412.14351","title":"Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?","created":"2024-12-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2509.21679","title":"ReviewScore: Misinformed Peer Review Detection with Large Language Models","created":"2025-09-25","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.07905","title":"CoCoReviewBench: A Completeness- and Correctness-Oriented Benchmark for AI Reviewers","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27209","title":"Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2501.13014","title":"Paper Quality Assessment based on Individual Wisdom Metrics from Open Peer Review","created":"2025-01-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.17377","title":"WarrantScore: Modeling Warrants between Claims and Evidence for Substantiation Evaluation in Peer Reviews","created":"2026-01-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.10118","title":"Reviewing the Reviewer: LLM-Assisted Reviewer Feedback Generation for Guideline Compliance","created":"2026-01-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.22166","title":"Rebuttals Move Peer-Review Scores, but Initial-Review Structure Bounds the Movement","created":"2026-06-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14571","title":"Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit System","created":"2026-06-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}