{"total":24,"rows":[{"id":"2407.01725","title":"DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models","created":"2024-07-01","cited_by_count":109,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2507.02825","title":"Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks","created":"2025-07-03","cited_by_count":102,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2404.17833","title":"Testing and Understanding Erroneous Planning in LLM Agents through Synthesized User Inputs","created":"2024-04-27","cited_by_count":22,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2502.01083","title":"Tool Unlearning for Tool-Augmented LLMs","created":"2025-02-03","cited_by_count":17,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2604.18240","title":"AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation","created":"2026-04-20","cited_by_count":12,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.19196","title":"Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?","created":"2026-05-18","cited_by_count":10,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2608.05179","title":"Autonomous Research Agents: A Survey of AI Scientists and the Verification Gap","created":"2026-06-29","cited_by_count":9,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.29920","title":"Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?","created":"2026-06-29","cited_by_count":7,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2505.20148","title":"MineAnyBuild: Benchmarking Spatial Planning for Open-world AI Agents","created":"2025-05-26","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2608.02827","title":"Emergence of Biased Consensus in Multi-Agent LLM Debates","created":"2026-08-03","cited_by_count":3,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2508.09125","title":"LogicIF: Towards Complex Logic Instruction Following","created":"2025-08-12","cited_by_count":2,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2510.11588","title":"Analyzing and Internalizing Complex Policy Documents for LLM Agents","created":"2025-10-13","cited_by_count":2,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2605.29430","title":"Towards Human-Like Interactive Speech Recognition With Agentic Correction and Semantic Evaluation","created":"2026-05-28","cited_by_count":2,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.00038","title":"trajectory-judge: What Outcome-Only LLM Judges Miss on Agent Trajectories","created":"2026-08-29","cited_by_count":2,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2601.11903","title":"AEMA: Verifiable Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy and Controlled Agentic LLM Systems","created":"2026-01-17","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2606.10296","title":"The Confident Liar: Diagnosing Multi-Agent Debate with Log-Probabilities and LLM-as-Judge","created":"2026-06-09","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2607.01153","title":"Adversarial Pragmatics for AI Safety Evaluation: A Diagnostic Framework and Seed Benchmark for Language-Mediated Control","created":"2026-07-01","cited_by_count":1,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2410.17950","title":"Benchmarking Floworks against OpenAI & Anthropic: A Novel Framework for Enhanced LLM Function Calling","created":"2024-10-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.13422","title":"Vibe Patenting: Evaluating LLM Judges for Professional Patent-Drafting Agents","created":"2026-09-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.36086","title":"PADMÉ: Preference Alignment Data Synthesis for Meta-Evaluation of LM Agent Evaluators","created":"2026-09-28","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.39958","title":"Better Deck or Different Judge? Evaluating Agentic Harness Gains in Corporate and Investment Banking","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.40103","title":"JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2610.04087","title":"DUET: Co-Evolving Solver and Grader Agents","created":"2026-10-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2610.18497","title":"Judges Follow the Reference: The Derivation Gap in Verifying Tool-Call Arguments","created":"2026-10-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"}],"next_cursor":null}