{"total":23,"rows":[{"id":"2508.16949","title":"Breaking the Exploration Bottleneck: Rubric-Scaffolded Reinforcement Learning for General LLM Reasoning","created":"2025-08-23","cited_by_count":63,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2505.22375","title":"Pangu Embedded: An Efficient Dual-system LLM Reasoner with Metacognition","created":"2025-05-28","cited_by_count":62,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2505.12864","title":"LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams","created":"2025-05-19","cited_by_count":54,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2407.05399","title":"IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning","created":"2024-07-07","cited_by_count":16,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2405.18638","title":"ConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Models","created":"2024-05-28","cited_by_count":15,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2403.14112","title":"Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning of LLMs: From Chinese-Specifics to Reasoning-Memorization Correlations","created":"2024-03-21","cited_by_count":14,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2511.07979","title":"Benchmarking Multi-Step Legal Reasoning and Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Effects in Large Language Models","created":"2025-11-11","cited_by_count":10,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2502.05675","title":"Investigating the Shortcomings of LLMs in Step-by-Step Legal Reasoning","created":"2025-02-08","cited_by_count":9,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2412.14588","title":"Beyond Guilt: Legal Judgment Prediction with Trichotomous Reasoning","created":"2024-12-19","cited_by_count":6,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2508.16383","title":"GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2025-08-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2502.17166","title":"JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning","created":"2025-02-24","cited_by_count":5,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2406.04046","title":"ActionReasoningBench: Reasoning about Actions with and without Ramification Constraints","created":"2024-06-06","cited_by_count":4,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2410.13352","title":"LAR-ECHR: A New Legal Argument Reasoning Task and Dataset for Cases of the European Court of Human Rights","created":"2024-10-17","cited_by_count":4,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2406.12386","title":"IPEval: A Bilingual Intellectual Property Agency Consultation Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models","created":"2024-06-18","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2509.24922","title":"MASLegalBench: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Systems in Deductive Legal Reasoning","created":"2025-09-29","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.05144","title":"Distilling the Thought, Watermarking the Answer: A Principle Semantic Guided Watermark for Large Reasoning Models","created":"2026-01-08","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2601.13183","title":"OpenExempt: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Legal Reasoning and a Framework for Creating Custom Benchmarks on Demand","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2504.04042","title":"An Explicit Syllogistic Legal Reasoning Framework for Large Language Models","created":"2025-04-05","cited_by_count":2,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2503.06949","title":"LexPro-1.0 Technical Report","created":"2025-03-10","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2506.13841","title":"LocationReasoner: Evaluating LLMs on Real-World Site Selection Reasoning","created":"2025-06-16","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2509.21208","title":"CLaw: Benchmarking Chinese Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models - A Fine-grained Corpus and Reasoning Analysis","created":"2025-09-25","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2607.03957","title":"NormWorlds-CF: Solver-Verified Counterfactual Normative Reasoning with Metamorphic-Relation GRPO","created":"2026-07-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2608.14610","title":"When Do LLMs Apply the Wrong Law? Diagnosing LLM Failures in Temporal Legal Reasoning","created":"2026-07-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"}],"next_cursor":null}