{"total":23,"rows":[{"id":"2505.05410","title":"Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think","created":"2025-05-08","cited_by_count":415,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2503.08679","title":"Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":170,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2402.01761","title":"Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models","created":"2024-01-30","cited_by_count":111,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2310.11207","title":"Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanations","created":"2023-10-17","cited_by_count":90,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2310.08559","title":"Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement","created":"2023-10-12","cited_by_count":89,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2501.08156","title":"Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?","created":"2025-01-14","cited_by_count":72,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2506.13206","title":"Thought Crime: Backdoors and Emergent Misalignment in Reasoning Models","created":"2025-06-16","cited_by_count":65,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2502.14829","title":"Measuring Chain of Thought Faithfulness by Unlearning Reasoning Steps","created":"2025-02-20","cited_by_count":47,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2403.05518","title":"Bias-Augmented Consistency Training Reduces Biased Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought","created":"2024-03-08","cited_by_count":39,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2505.13774","title":"Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models","created":"2025-05-19","cited_by_count":23,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2506.22777","title":"Teaching Models to Verbalize Reward Hacking in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","created":"2025-06-28","cited_by_count":21,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2602.20710","title":"Counterfactual Simulation Training for Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness","created":"2026-02-24","cited_by_count":17,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2602.02639","title":"A Positive Case for Faithfulness: LLM Self-Explanations Help Predict Model Behavior","created":"2026-02-02","cited_by_count":13,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2310.13439","title":"Self-Consistency of Large Language Models under Ambiguity","created":"2023-10-20","cited_by_count":12,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2505.23945","title":"A Closer Look at Bias and Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness of Large (Vision) Language Models","created":"2025-05-29","cited_by_count":12,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2505.17406","title":"Robust Answers, Fragile Logic: Probing the Decoupling Hypothesis in LLM Reasoning","created":"2025-05-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.22074","title":"Outcome Rewards Do Not Guarantee Verifiable or Causally Important Reasoning","created":"2026-04-23","cited_by_count":7,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2311.08390","title":"Predicting Text Preference Via Structured Comparative Reasoning","created":"2023-11-14","cited_by_count":6,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2510.13272","title":"Beyond Correctness: Rewarding Faithful Reasoning in Retrieval-Augmented Generation","created":"2025-10-15","cited_by_count":6,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2608.16747","title":"Would this change your answer? Evaluating Explanations of LLM Behavior In The Wild with Counterfactual Experiments","created":"2026-08-17","cited_by_count":2,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2509.22363","title":"Investigating Faithfulness in Large Audio Language Models","created":"2025-09-26","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.04418","title":"Justified or Just Convincing? Error Verifiability as a Dimension of LLM Quality","created":"2026-04-06","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2606.15779","title":"Faithful Action-unit Causal Reasoning for Counterfactually Faithful Emotion Explanations","created":"2026-06-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"}],"next_cursor":null}