{"total":31,"rows":[{"id":"2310.01783","title":"Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis","created":"2023-10-03","cited_by_count":200,"area":null},{"id":"2411.00816","title":"CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review","created":"2024-10-28","cited_by_count":148,"area":null},{"id":"2406.16253","title":"LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":62,"area":null},{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61,"area":null},{"id":"2406.05688","title":"Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactions","created":"2024-06-09","cited_by_count":46,"area":null},{"id":"2408.10365","title":"AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews","created":"2024-08-19","cited_by_count":44,"area":null},{"id":"2405.20477","title":"Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistance","created":"2024-05-30","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2503.08506","title":"ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":32,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11736","title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","created":"2025-02-17","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.17086","title":"Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews","created":"2025-02-24","cited_by_count":24,"area":null},{"id":"2411.07127","title":"Benchmarking LLMs' Judgments with No Gold Standard","created":"2024-11-11","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11113","title":"Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks","created":"2025-06-08","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2412.10415","title":"Generative Adversarial Reviews: When LLMs Become the Critic","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11343","title":"From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2508.14146","title":"MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation","created":"2025-08-19","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2407.04046","title":"Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation","created":"2024-07-04","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2503.01424","title":"From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems","created":"2025-03-03","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2505.16330","title":"SC4ANM: Identifying Optimal Section Combinations for Automated Novelty Prediction in Academic Papers","created":"2025-05-22","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2508.11779","title":"A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs' Processing of Academic Text Input","created":"2025-08-15","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.23593","title":"When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2312.03497","title":"Speculative Exploration on the Concept of Artificial Agents Conducting Autonomous Research","created":"2023-12-06","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.00733","title":"EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations","created":"2026-01-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19578","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2608.03581","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality","created":"2026-08-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.20214","title":"Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge","created":"2026-03-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.02775","title":"Towards a new paradigm of scientific discovery with socialized artificial intelligence","created":"2026-08-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.11087","title":"Beyond Imitation: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}