{"total":89,"rows":[{"id":"2307.10169","title":"Challenges and Applications of Large Language Models","created":"2023-07-19","cited_by_count":254,"area":null},{"id":"2310.01783","title":"Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis","created":"2023-10-03","cited_by_count":200,"area":null},{"id":"2403.07183","title":"Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews","created":"2024-03-11","cited_by_count":164,"area":null},{"id":"2411.00816","title":"CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review","created":"2024-10-28","cited_by_count":148,"area":null},{"id":"2404.01268","title":"Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers","created":"2024-04-01","cited_by_count":118,"area":null},{"id":"2406.10833","title":"A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery","created":"2024-06-16","cited_by_count":96,"area":null},{"id":"2505.13259","title":"From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery","created":"2025-05-19","cited_by_count":93,"area":null},{"id":"2412.11948","title":"OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":65,"area":null},{"id":"2406.16253","title":"LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":62,"area":null},{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61,"area":null},{"id":"2412.01708","title":"Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review","created":"2024-12-02","cited_by_count":53,"area":null},{"id":"2504.09737","title":"Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025","created":"2025-04-13","cited_by_count":47,"area":null},{"id":"2406.05688","title":"Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactions","created":"2024-06-09","cited_by_count":46,"area":null},{"id":"2408.10365","title":"AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews","created":"2024-08-19","cited_by_count":44,"area":null},{"id":"2307.05492","title":"GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study","created":"2023-06-16","cited_by_count":40,"area":null},{"id":"2406.14325","title":"Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Drivers","created":"2024-06-20","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2505.04966","title":"Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards","created":"2025-05-08","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2407.12857","title":"Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis","created":"2024-07-09","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2503.08506","title":"ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":32,"area":null},{"id":"2509.08713","title":"The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist Systems","created":"2025-09-10","cited_by_count":29,"area":null},{"id":"2511.01805","title":"Accumulating Context Changes the Beliefs of Language Models","created":"2025-11-03","cited_by_count":28,"area":null},{"id":"2402.07282","title":"How do Large Language Models Navigate Conflicts between Honesty and Helpfulness?","created":"2024-02-11","cited_by_count":27,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11736","title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","created":"2025-02-17","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.19614","title":"Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review","created":"2025-02-26","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2411.07127","title":"Benchmarking LLMs' Judgments with No Gold Standard","created":"2024-11-11","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2604.13940","title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","created":"2026-04-15","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2403.15529","title":"LimGen: Probing the LLMs for Generating Suggestive Limitations of Research Papers","created":"2024-03-22","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2411.03417","title":"Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment","created":"2024-11-05","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11113","title":"Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks","created":"2025-06-08","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2510.08867","title":"ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review","created":"2025-10-09","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2307.10320","title":"Reproducibility in Machine Learning-Driven Research","created":"2023-07-19","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2405.15077","title":"Eliciting Informative Text Evaluations with Large Language Models","created":"2024-05-23","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2311.00687","title":"Improving Interpersonal Communication by Simulating Audiences with Language Models","created":"2023-11-01","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2511.21843","title":"FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers","created":"2025-11-26","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2605.03202","title":"Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation","created":"2026-05-04","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2412.10415","title":"Generative Adversarial Reviews: When LLMs Become the Critic","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11343","title":"From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2508.14146","title":"MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation","created":"2025-08-19","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2506.04410","title":"Matter-of-Fact: A Benchmark for Verifying the Feasibility of Literature-Supported Claims in Materials Science","created":"2025-06-04","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2506.08134","title":"Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2310.02174","title":"Ask Again, Then Fail: Large Language Models' Vacillations in Judgment","created":"2023-10-03","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2503.01424","title":"From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems","created":"2025-03-03","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2503.05712","title":"Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Artificially Generated Scientific Research","created":"2025-02-14","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2505.16330","title":"SC4ANM: Identifying Optimal Section Combinations for Automated Novelty Prediction in Academic Papers","created":"2025-05-22","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2601.06884","title":"Paraphrasing Adversarial Attack on LLM-as-a-Reviewer","created":"2026-01-11","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2403.04382","title":"Acceleron: A Tool to Accelerate Research Ideation","created":"2024-03-07","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2409.13712","title":"Good Idea or Not, Representation of LLM Could Tell","created":"2024-09-07","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2605.20668","title":"On the limits and opportunities of AI reviewers: Reviewing the reviews of Nature-family papers with 45 expert scientists","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2505.21537","title":"OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models","created":"2025-05-24","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2508.11779","title":"A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs' Processing of Academic Text Input","created":"2025-08-15","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2512.05925","title":"To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysis","created":"2025-12-05","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2411.18831","title":"Measuring Risk of Bias in Biomedical Reports: The RoBBR Benchmark","created":"2024-11-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2504.06910","title":"Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews","created":"2025-04-09","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2512.09443","title":"A Human-AI Collaborative Workflow for Mathematical Discovery: A Case Study in Grover-Compatible Riemannian Optimization","created":"2025-12-10","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.22638","title":"ScholarPeer: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-01-30","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.16909","title":"Preventing the Collapse of Peer Review Requires Verification-First AI","created":"2026-01-23","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2412.07019","title":"Assessing the Impact of Conspiracy Theories Using Large Language Models","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2412.11939","title":"SEAGraph: Unveiling the Whole Story of Paper Review Comments","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2603.17588","title":"From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation","created":"2026-03-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.23593","title":"When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.07905","title":"CoCoReviewBench: A Completeness- and Correctness-Oriented Benchmark for AI Reviewers","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.24892","title":"ReviewGuard: Aligning LLM-Assisted Peer Review with Long-Term Scientific Impact","created":"2026-05-29","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2312.03497","title":"Speculative Exploration on the Concept of Artificial Agents Conducting Autonomous Research","created":"2023-12-06","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.00733","title":"EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations","created":"2026-01-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.13817","title":"What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?","created":"2026-02-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19578","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27845","title":"AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification","created":"2026-07-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2607.28631","title":"Can AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review","created":"2026-04-18","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2511.05496","title":"DOCUEVAL: An LLM-based AI Engineering Tool for Building Customisable Document Evaluation Workflows","created":"2025-09-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.19925","title":"Evaluating Large Language Models for Abstract Evaluation Tasks: An Empirical Study","created":"2026-01-09","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.23526","title":"Plato's Cave: A Human-Centered Research Verification System","created":"2026-03-06","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.23233","title":"Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generation","created":"2026-06-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.01240","title":"Prompt Framing Distorts Count Based Evaluation of LLM Error Detection: Evidence from Numeric Anchoring","created":"2026-05-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14571","title":"Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit System","created":"2026-06-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14625","title":"Local AI pre-screening for human triple-blind peer review in health sciences","created":"2026-07-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.28626","title":"Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects","created":"2026-07-31","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.23264","title":"Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics","created":"2026-09-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.36617","title":"Generating Edit-Inducing Questions for AI Research Manuscripts","created":"2026-09-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.37097","title":"Breaking the Illusion of Review Reliability under Static Evaluation: SCOPE Fuzzing for LLM-based Scientific Reviewers","created":"2026-09-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.07184","title":"Learning Scientific Exploration from Human Research Decision Trajectories","created":"2026-10-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.11087","title":"Beyond Imitation: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.18435","title":"How Well Do LLMs Perform in Peer Review? Evidence from Finance and Accounting","created":"2026-10-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}