{"total":22,"rows":[{"id":"2412.11948","title":"OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":65,"area":null},{"id":"2406.16253","title":"LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":62,"area":null},{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.17086","title":"Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews","created":"2025-02-24","cited_by_count":24,"area":null},{"id":"2402.15589","title":"LLMs as Meta-Reviewers' Assistants: A Case Study","created":"2024-02-23","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2402.18005","title":"A Sentiment Consolidation Framework for Meta-Review Generation","created":"2024-02-28","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2507.11810","title":"Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator","created":"2025-07-16","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2503.01424","title":"From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems","created":"2025-03-03","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2401.17658","title":"Document Structure in Long Document Transformers","created":"2024-01-31","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11614","title":"Is Human-Like Text Liked by Humans? Multilingual Human Detection and Preference Against AI","created":"2025-02-17","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2501.17191","title":"Decomposed Opinion Summarization with Verified Aspect-Aware Modules","created":"2025-01-27","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2508.05283","title":"Decision-Making with Deliberation: Meta-reviewing as a Document-grounded Dialogue","created":"2025-08-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2601.04350","title":"RIGOURATE: Quantifying Scientific Exaggeration with Evidence-Aligned Claim Evaluation","created":"2026-01-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.23593","title":"When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.24071","title":"PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality","created":"2026-04-27","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2510.23104","title":"Leveraging Hierarchical Organization for Medical Multi-document Summarization","created":"2025-10-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.19277","title":"MOSAIC: Modular Opinion Summarization using Aspect Identification and Clustering","created":"2026-03-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.24028","title":"When Evidence Conflicts: Reliability-aware Meta-review Generation","created":"2026-09-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.38799","title":"Overlap, Unique and Conflict: Can LLMs Extract What They Can Recognize?","created":"2026-09-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}