{"list":"other","total":58,"rows":[{"id":"1908.09635","title":"A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning","created":"2019-08-23","cited_by_count":1917},{"id":"1809.02208","title":"Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translate","created":"2018-09-06","cited_by_count":121},{"id":"2006.00093","title":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Review","created":"2020-05-29","cited_by_count":79},{"id":"2102.00176","title":"Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?","created":"2021-01-30","cited_by_count":63},{"id":"2006.03257","title":"Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis of Scientific Reviews","created":"2020-06-05","cited_by_count":24},{"id":"2010.05137","title":"An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process","created":"2020-10-11","cited_by_count":24},{"id":"1809.04365","title":"Predicting citation counts based on deep neural network learning techniques","created":"2018-09-12","cited_by_count":21},{"id":"2107.06751","title":"Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals","created":"2021-07-12","cited_by_count":17},{"id":"1906.11964","title":"OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship","created":"2019-06-27","cited_by_count":16},{"id":"1605.04951","title":"Viziometrics: Analyzing Visual Information in the Scientific Literature","created":"2016-05-16","cited_by_count":15},{"id":"1511.08096","title":"The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a Comparative Analysis","created":"2015-11-25","cited_by_count":14},{"id":"2004.14329","title":"Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations","created":"2020-04-29","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2005.10732","title":"Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic","created":"2020-05-21","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2104.02562","title":"Structured Citation Trend Prediction Using Graph Neural Networks","created":"2021-04-06","cited_by_count":11},{"id":"2007.13826","title":"Large Scale Subject Category Classification of Scholarly Papers with Deep Attentive Neural Networks","created":"2020-07-27","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"2011.00223","title":"The Journal Coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A Comparative Analysis","created":"2020-10-31","cited_by_count":9},{"id":"1410.8544","title":"Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900","created":"2014-10-30","cited_by_count":8},{"id":"1804.09070","title":"International Research Collaboration: Novelty, Conventionality, and Atypicality in Knowledge Recombination","created":"2018-04-24","cited_by_count":8},{"id":"1401.4321","title":"Do altmetrics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective","created":"2014-01-17","cited_by_count":7},{"id":"1801.10311","title":"Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?","created":"2018-01-31","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"1907.11843","title":"Analyzing Linguistic Complexity and Scientific Impact","created":"2019-07-27","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"2012.13599","title":"Early Indicators of Scientific Impact: Predicting Citations with Altmetrics","created":"2020-12-25","cited_by_count":6},{"id":"1511.05078","title":"Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?","created":"2015-11-16","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"1608.08112","title":"Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature","created":"2016-08-29","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"1702.03411","title":"Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer","created":"2017-02-11","cited_by_count":4},{"id":"1605.07465","title":"Impact of lexical and sentiment factors on the popularity of scientific papers","created":"2016-05-24","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"1612.01431","title":"Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation","created":"2016-12-05","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"1803.07525","title":"Dimensions: A Competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?","created":"2018-03-20","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"1807.03977","title":"Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF)","created":"2018-07-11","cited_by_count":3},{"id":"1407.7849","title":"The Operationalization of \"Fields\" as WoS Subject Categories (WCs) in Evaluative Bibliometrics: The cases of \"Library and Information Science\" and \"Science & Technology Studies\"","created":"2014-07-29","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1501.01076","title":"The Effects of Research Level and Article Type on the Differences between Citation Metrics and F1000 Recommendations","created":"2015-01-06","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1511.00735","title":"Large-Scale Analysis of the Accuracy of the Journal Classification Systems of Web of Science and Scopus","created":"2015-11-02","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1709.03453","title":"Research Portfolio Analysis and Topic Prominence","created":"2017-09-11","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1712.04659","title":"The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact","created":"2017-12-13","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1810.13339","title":"The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy","created":"2018-10-31","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1901.05273","title":"Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of specialties","created":"2019-01-16","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1904.06052","title":"COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations","created":"2019-04-12","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2104.11943","title":"Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies","created":"2021-04-24","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"2106.12340","title":"GraphConfRec: A Graph Neural Network-Based Conference Recommender System","created":"2021-06-23","cited_by_count":2},{"id":"1305.6256","title":"Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence","created":"2013-05-27","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1307.7498","title":"The normalization of citation counts based on classification systems","created":"2013-07-29","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1309.2413","title":"The Google Scholar Experiment: how to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators","created":"2013-09-10","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1404.0359","title":"Inter-rater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review","created":"2014-03-31","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1407.6239","title":"About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers","created":"2014-07-23","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1411.1996","title":"Predicting results of the Research Excellence Framework using departmental $h$-Index","created":"2014-11-07","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1501.07857","title":"Predicting Results of the Research Excellence Framework using Departmental h-Index -- Revisited","created":"2015-01-30","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1602.00419","title":"Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores","created":"2016-02-01","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1711.07291","title":"Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data","created":"2017-11-20","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1801.02466","title":"Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of topics","created":"2018-01-08","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1801.09985","title":"Field normalization of scientometric indicators","created":"2018-01-30","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1802.07677","title":"Can Microsoft Academic assess the early citation impact of in-press articles? A multi-discipline exploratory analysis","created":"2018-02-21","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1804.05365","title":"Dimensions: re-discovering the ecosystem of scientific information","created":"2018-04-15","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1811.01765","title":"Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics","created":"2018-11-05","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1812.07842","title":"Allocative efficiency in public research funding:can bibliometrics help?","created":"2018-12-19","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1903.11119","title":"Like-for-like bibliometric substitutes for peer review: advantages and limits of indicators calculated from the ep index","created":"2019-03-26","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1904.12919","title":"Female citation impact superiority 1996-2018 in six out of seven English-speaking nations","created":"2019-04-29","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1906.07011","title":"Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus","created":"2019-06-17","cited_by_count":1},{"id":"1910.00789","title":"Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields","created":"2019-10-02","cited_by_count":1}],"next_cursor":null}