{"total":27,"rows":[{"id":"2406.16253","title":"LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":62,"area":null},{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61,"area":null},{"id":"2407.12857","title":"Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis","created":"2024-07-09","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2506.07642","title":"TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Review","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":31,"area":null},{"id":"2505.11855","title":"When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research","created":"2025-05-17","cited_by_count":26,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11736","title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","created":"2025-02-17","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2511.04583","title":"Jr. AI Scientist and Its Risk Report: Autonomous Scientific Exploration from a Baseline Paper","created":"2025-11-06","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11343","title":"From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2510.13201","title":"Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferences","created":"2025-10-15","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2409.16813","title":"PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMs","created":"2024-09-25","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2512.22145","title":"Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models","created":"2025-12-14","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2505.21537","title":"OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models","created":"2025-05-24","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2312.04576","title":"The Open Review-Based (ORB) dataset: Towards Automatic Assessment of Scientific Papers and Experiment Proposals in High-Energy Physics","created":"2023-11-29","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2602.11173","title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27360","title":"Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2412.11939","title":"SEAGraph: Unveiling the Whole Story of Paper Review Comments","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2602.14285","title":"FMMD: A multimodal multidisciplinary dataset of open peer reviews from F1000Research","created":"2026-02-15","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.28515","title":"EarlySciRev: A Dataset of Early-Stage Scientific Revisions Extracted from LaTeX Writing Traces","created":"2026-03-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27845","title":"AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification","created":"2026-07-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2410.05575","title":"ClaimBrush: A Novel Framework for Automated Patent Claim Refinement Based on Large Language Models","created":"2024-10-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22681","title":"From peer review nuances to best practices","created":"2026-07-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.07641","title":"SurveyReview: A Reviewer-Aligned Benchmark for Survey Evaluators","created":"2026-08-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.05947","title":"Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-09-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}