{"total":60,"rows":[{"id":"2403.07183","title":"Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews","created":"2024-03-11","cited_by_count":164,"area":null},{"id":"2412.11948","title":"OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":65,"area":null},{"id":"2406.16253","title":"LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":62,"area":null},{"id":"2501.10326","title":"Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey","created":"2025-01-17","cited_by_count":61,"area":null},{"id":"2502.05151","title":"Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation","created":"2025-02-07","cited_by_count":42,"area":"mllm"},{"id":"2405.20477","title":"Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistance","created":"2024-05-30","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2407.12857","title":"Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis","created":"2024-07-09","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2503.08506","title":"ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews","created":"2025-03-11","cited_by_count":32,"area":null},{"id":"2505.11855","title":"When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research","created":"2025-05-17","cited_by_count":26,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2505.07920","title":"Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussions","created":"2025-05-12","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2502.13668","title":"PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews","created":"2025-02-19","cited_by_count":22,"area":null},{"id":"2311.11967","title":"Automatic Analysis of Substantiation in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2023-11-20","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2504.16728","title":"IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery","created":"2025-04-23","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2508.10308","title":"ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RL","created":"2025-08-14","cited_by_count":19,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2311.03998","title":"Exploring Jiu-Jitsu Argumentation for Writing Peer Review Rebuttals","created":"2023-11-07","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2509.04484","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors","created":"2025-08-31","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2305.14647","title":"Scientific Opinion Summarization: Paper Meta-review Generation Dataset, Methods, and Evaluation","created":"2023-05-24","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2511.21843","title":"FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers","created":"2025-11-26","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2504.11042","title":"LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews","created":"2025-04-15","cited_by_count":13,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2406.00197","title":"Re3: A Holistic Framework and Dataset for Modeling Collaborative Document Revision","created":"2024-05-31","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2507.16007","title":"Help Me Write a Story: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Generate Writing Feedback","created":"2025-07-21","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2508.21422","title":"Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework","created":"2025-08-29","cited_by_count":11,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2508.14146","title":"MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation","created":"2025-08-19","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2503.01424","title":"From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems","created":"2025-03-03","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2503.05712","title":"Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Artificially Generated Scientific Research","created":"2025-02-14","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2604.11543","title":"NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-04-13","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2403.04382","title":"Acceleron: A Tool to Accelerate Research Ideation","created":"2024-03-07","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11193","title":"Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review","created":"2025-02-16","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2603.09723","title":"RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation","created":"2026-03-10","cited_by_count":6,"area":"alignment"},{"id":"2504.06910","title":"Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews","created":"2025-04-09","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2505.15031","title":"Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2025-05-21","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2602.11173","title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27360","title":"Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2508.05283","title":"Decision-Making with Deliberation: Meta-reviewing as a Document-grounded Dialogue","created":"2025-08-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22553","title":"Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review","created":"2026-05-16","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2504.14620","title":"A Hierarchical Framework for Measuring Scientific Paper Innovation via Large Language Models","created":"2025-04-20","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.06536","title":"Expos\\'ia: Teaching and Assessment of Academic Writing Skills for Research Project Proposals and Peer Feedback","created":"2026-01-10","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06054","title":"Are We Truly Innovating? A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Originality in AI Research Papers","created":"2026-01-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.00003","title":"Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review","created":"2026-01-08","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.28515","title":"EarlySciRev: A Dataset of Early-Stage Scientific Revisions Extracted from LaTeX Writing Traces","created":"2026-03-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.28897","title":"Review Arcade: On the Human Alignment and Gameability of LLM Reviews","created":"2026-05-27","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.12716","title":"Does AI Reviewer See the Full Picture? Attacking and Defending Multimodal Peer Review","created":"2026-06-10","cited_by_count":1,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2606.25057","title":"LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges","created":"2026-06-23","cited_by_count":1,"area":"safety"},{"id":"2607.27845","title":"AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification","created":"2026-07-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2509.01387","title":"ABCD-LINK: Annotation Bootstrapping for Cross-Document Fine-Grained Links","created":"2025-09-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":"synth"},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.10118","title":"Reviewing the Reviewer: LLM-Assisted Reviewer Feedback Generation for Guideline Compliance","created":"2026-01-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.15887","title":"Intelligence Is Not the Bottleneck: Validating an LLM First-Pass Manuscript Score Against Peer-Review Outcomes","created":"2026-06-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.22166","title":"Rebuttals Move Peer-Review Scores, but Initial-Review Structure Bounds the Movement","created":"2026-06-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.01240","title":"Prompt Framing Distorts Count Based Evaluation of LLM Error Detection: Evidence from Numeric Anchoring","created":"2026-05-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22681","title":"From peer review nuances to best practices","created":"2026-07-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.20777","title":"Tree-of-Concerns: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Debate for Unstated-Limitation Extraction in Scientific Critique","created":"2026-08-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.03943","title":"More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R","created":"2026-09-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.05947","title":"Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review","created":"2026-09-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11460","title":"ReGround: Grounding Reviewer Comments in Multimodal Evidence","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.14770","title":"How broad is that claim? Mapping Generalisation in NLP Research","created":"2026-09-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.28041","title":"How Much Were You Told? Measuring External Information in Peer Reviews","created":"2026-09-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}