{"total":18,"rows":[{"id":"2310.01783","title":"Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis","created":"2023-10-03","cited_by_count":200,"area":null},{"id":"2411.00816","title":"CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review","created":"2024-10-28","cited_by_count":148,"area":null},{"id":"2306.00622","title":"ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":122,"area":null},{"id":"2407.12857","title":"Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis","created":"2024-07-09","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2505.07920","title":"Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussions","created":"2025-05-12","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11343","title":"From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review","created":"2025-06-12","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2406.10294","title":"RelevAI-Reviewer: A Benchmark on AI Reviewers for Survey Paper Relevance","created":"2024-06-13","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2306.13891","title":"Estimating the Causal Effect of Early ArXiving on Paper Acceptance","created":"2023-06-24","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27360","title":"Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2410.09510","title":"SciEvo: A 2 Million, 30-Year Cross-disciplinary Dataset for Temporal Scientometric Analysis","created":"2024-10-12","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2502.00874","title":"Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process","created":"2025-02-02","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2507.14741","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","created":"2025-07-19","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.23593","title":"When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2408.14772","title":"A global AI community requires language-diverse publishing","created":"2024-08-27","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19578","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}